1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 49
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #32
    Advisory Panel smellie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    01-14-2019 @ 09:17 AM
    Location
    Virden, Man. Pop 3250, 4 miles from Wolverine's range!
    Posts
    632
    Local Date
    07-02-2025
    Local Time
    06:59 AM
    Had a guy over on CGN the other day, proposed rechambering a Number 4 to 7.62x54R in order to 'take advantage' of the inexpensive surplus ammunition.

    So I got out my Radio Shack $6 "brain" (my organic one being defective) and calculated out bolt thrust per round, assuming standard Service pressures and no hot loads. It came out to being a little over a Proof round for every shot. Thankfully, that dissuaded him from the conversion and he is now setting up to handload his .303s.

    I have been at this just about 50 years now and the ONLY thing I have seen which approached a "catastrophic failure" with a Lee rifle involved the rifle primarily as one of the VICTIMS. It was actually a Brain Failure in which the rifle was fired WITHOUT A BOLT-HEAD IN PLACE. When the rifle was brought to me, I unscrewed the fired casing from the split bolt-shank in order to take photos. The wonderful surgeons at the James Paton Memorial Hospital in Gander managed to get ALL of the brass splinters out of the boy's eye and saved his eyesight. The Rifle was given a new Bolt, WITH a bolt-head this time, and still is being used.

    But that was hardly the fault of the RIFLE.

    I would put the 1910 ROSS right up there with the M-1 Garandicon as to strength of the action. Ross fired the 1905 action at 125,000 psi and it didn't wreck it, so he then designed the much-stronger 1910 with the 7 forward locking-lugs. Bolts were factory lapped-in on these rifles and I know of NONE which has been destroyed through having a cartridge fired in it, given that the thing was properly assembled to begin with. Considering that the first Mark III ROSS Rifles were delivered to the Canadianicon Militia 100 years ago this year, that is a pretty impressive record.

    Hope this helps.
    .

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to smellie For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Strength of Krag actions
    By grouch in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 09-24-2012, 11:24 PM
  2. Trying to get my Enfield back in action
    By podmonkey in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-03-2011, 04:46 PM
  3. Can someone give me some info about this enfield action?
    By slickyboyboo in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-14-2011, 05:06 AM
  4. 96 swede reciever strength
    By lamarpye in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-05-2010, 09:01 PM
  5. Enfield Number 4 action target sight.
    By PrinzEugen in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-09-2008, 04:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts