Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: An explosively dismantled Enfeld

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:13 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,740
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    06-02-2025
    Local Time
    06:35 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chadwick View Post
    .
    .............."Any changes to any pressure parts (bolt, action, bolt head or barrel) require the weapon to be re-proofed." Taken literally, that would also mean mean recrowning, rebluing, or just plain removal of rust. So how literally do you take it?....
    A good question, and one that is not understood by our Police Firearms department.
    I was looking to buy a proof marked complete barreled action (with bolt) and the Police told me that once I had replaced the 'furniture' I would have to submit it for re-proofing - they still insisted even after I explained that their statement was bovine excrement, it finally took a letter from the proof house explaining that they made the proof tests WITHOUT the furniture (due to potential damage whilst in the clamps), and stated that it did say on their web-site that furniture should be removed before the rifle is submitted for testing - that the Police 'caved-in'.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Martini Enfeld question
    By Maxwell Smart in forum Martini Henry Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-25-2013, 11:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts