Strange (To Me) LB No.4 MK I Rear Sight

[Patrick Chadwick]

It wasn't a Mk3 ?

http://photos.imageevent.com/badgerd...sighttypes.JPG

There seems to be a mistake in the drawings in this link. The aperture diameters are given as 0.02" / 0.01". That would be a horribly fine hole to look through!

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[jmoore]

There seems to be a mistake in the drawings in this link. The aperture diameters are given as 0.02" / 0.01". That would be a horribly fine hole to look through!

That's the artic summer option. Or Post WWII, the "take a last shot during the atomic blast" option.