1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 05:10 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,205
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    06-15-2025
    Local Time
    04:35 AM
    Pretty much the norm for Range rifles, ww1 actions were much preferred due to tighter tolerances, the earlier the better.
    The opposed arrows S stands for sold out of service, the R MA 3/46 means it was refurbished by the Small Arms Factory or one of it's Satelites in March 1946.
    This was the normal refurb period post war, trying to keep servicemen employed and skills maintained as the country and industry recovered post war.
    A large proportion of the firearms forcibly recalled in the early years of WW2 were all target rifles, not all were returned to their owners, but what were returned were completely rebuilt to the standard they were when resumed, those rifles that were lost in the system were replaced by 1942-44 receivers made up in heavy barrel configuration and new timber, not as good as the original, but better than nothing at all.
    Imagine a kind hearted government giving back firearms now.

    3MD is Victoria, Slazenger were the timber manufacturers.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by muffett.2008; 12-17-2012 at 04:52 AM.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to muffett.2008 For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Building a P-13 Enfield in .276 Enfield
    By Romeo 33 Delta in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-29-2016, 08:39 PM
  2. 1924 ShtLE (Short Lee-Enfield) No.1 MkV Rifle (Mfg by RSAF Enfield)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-07-2007, 12:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts