Milsurps Talk Radio
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: 1934 Banner Mauser

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 12:06 AM
    Posts
    2,522
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    05:06 AM
    A rather neat and clear stamping on a sanded stock? Receiver appears buffed and re-blued to me. Not too sure what I am looking at.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    krebin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last On
    03-18-2014 @ 12:27 PM
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    06:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    Again thanks for all the input, it's highly appreciated!

    @ Doug and Patrick. I'll take the rifle apart to check up on all the internal numbers.

    @ Steve. The stock appears very authentick, it's hard to see on the pic's but it has what appears to real patina and is more "worn" than sanded. The receiver may, but I doubt it, have been reblued.

    Kris

  3. #3
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    06:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Calif-Steve View Post
    A rather neat and clear stamping on a sanded stock? Receiver appears buffed and re-blued to me. Not too sure what I am looking at.
    It is hard to tell for sure from the photos whether the metal's been reblued and the stock scrubbed, but your suspicions are valid. The few Banner Mausers I've seen have had higher degree of polish than usual on the action and bands. A little edge rounding, but it should be of generally high quality. The stocks seem to also to have had a bit more rubbing, but the edges should be even and the grain well filled. Could probably tell in under a minute if the rifle were in hand whether it's been redone. There's certainly enough clues in the photos to be wary at this point.

  4. #4
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by jmoore View Post
    There's certainly enough clues in the photos to be wary at this point.

    Calif-Steve and jmoore. I know what you mean. After all, one of my favorite precautionary sayings is "if it looks too good to be true, then it probably is ... too good to be true".

    The other is AFAICTWAHTOIMH:
    As Far As I Can Tell Without Actually Having The Object In My Hands

    With these reservtions in mind, I agree that in the end the barreled action has to be removed from the body. After nearly 70 years, just about every rifle that has not been kept in the wrap since manufacture will show a difference at the "waterline" where the barrel channel starts. Even if it's just a shading in the bluing. And whether, for instance, bluing goes across worn edges (indicating rebluing after the wear) is another feature that requires examination under an eyeglass.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 01-14-2013 at 05:47 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-29-2012, 04:19 PM
  2. 1934 Deutsches Reichsbahn Banner Mauser ....
    By Len in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-27-2012, 11:41 AM
  3. Mauser 1934 Banner
    By remi in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 07:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts