Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: No4 barrel bedding sharing

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Legacy Member Frederick303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    07-28-2020 @ 09:41 PM
    Location
    Pipersville PA US
    Posts
    739
    Local Date
    07-04-2025
    Local Time
    09:01 PM
    Very good point(s) Thunderbox, but I will have to still disagree based on my experience. I have seen No4 of WWII construction that would on a camping trip shift zero over night due to the wet morning conditions. You could feel the difference in the wood based on the spring of the barrel in the front of the wood and in the shift in the shooting. Seasoned wood, but if it is not cut correctly in the first place, it will move with changes in humidity and temp.

    Where I live, we have hot humid summers and both periods of cold/ wet, or very cold-dry in winter plus all conditions in between. Getting to matches in summer means having the rifle in a hot trunk at ~100 degrees for a few hours. I maintain very careful log books on each of my shooting rifles and I have seen shifts on more then one rifle, not all WWII make. Of course my rifles shop does not have heat, so perhaps the shifts are more noticeable then someone who keeps their rifles in a house environment.

    In any case on a rifle that has that tendency, central bedding is the cure and it works very well indeed, once properly cared out.

    By the by, I do not disagree that a conventionally bedded No 4 rifle can be accurate or that if we did a statistical study that it would prove to be on edge slightly better, especially for long range. I think the postings of Capt. Laidlericon would support the idea that the front bedded rifles gave the best accuracy out of sniper rifles and hence service rifles. I am not denying that.

    But the fact remains that the first post simply stated that center bedding made things worse, and by a significant margin. That is simply not so if it is done correctly and if you are using the tight sling approach used in NRA type competition that there are other benefits that folks that shoot off of the bench will not see or understand. A central bedded rifle, done correctly offers a significant reduction in shifts due to pressure points on the forward portion of the forend. Testing rifles in a conventional bench rest or rifle cradle will not illustrate that point, shooting matches will.

    If you challenge that point, how do you explain the popularity of center bedding with the Bisley crowd or the cadets?

  2. Thank You to Frederick303 For This Useful Post:

    bow

Similar Threads

  1. Sharing collection pics - US M3, M4, M7
    By davfink in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-28-2012, 01:34 PM
  2. Barrel bedding and M1903A3
    By Allen Humphrey in forum Range Reports - Show us how good you are!
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-02-2011, 02:04 PM
  3. Grease between Forend and Barrel - Some form of bedding?
    By martini in forum Martini Henry Rifles
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-28-2010, 04:21 AM
  4. bedding the ol H barrel? Plus a bedding material Q
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-04-2010, 08:44 AM
  5. Factory Parts Sharing??
    By Lance in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-07-2010, 06:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts