-
Legacy Member
Lee Speed from BSA and I need info
Last edited by Badger; 02-23-2013 at 10:07 AM.
Reason: Edited to show pics in-line with post to make viewing easier for members ...
-
Thank You to mtbikerwvu For This Useful Post:
-
02-23-2013 09:39 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Mag spring is correct for early Lee Speeds, the same type as fitted to the Long Lee Enfield Rifles
and the cavalry carbine. Sounds like you need to replace yours as it has become weak over the last hundred plus years. Lovely rifle with elegant lines.
-
Thank You to birdhound For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
Thanks for the info, figured the spring was weak and now have to find one. I also think the feed lip, left front of mag is worn and may need built back up. Will let you know how it goes.
-
-
Hopefully you can put it to some use yet! Slick little hunting rifles they are.
-
Thank You to jmoore For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Thats a strange mix of rifles you have there.
I see a lee speed commercial rifle fitted with a mk3 forend and barrel band and a sporting butt stock of unknown origin.
To get that barrel band on there they would have removed the original front sight. From the pics I cant see the front site clear enough to see if its original
Last edited by ActionYobbo; 02-23-2013 at 10:21 PM.
-
-
Legacy Member
Ok, how do you remove the dust cover from the bolt? Seems straight forward but it's not moving.
-
-
Legacy Member
The rear edge of the dust cover fits in a slot on top of the bolt just in front of the cocking piece.
-
-
Legacy Member
mtbiker: one of mine required some firm tapping with a brass drift to slide it out from the retaining lugs (while lifting the end out of the grooves). Any chance of a few more photos of markings?
Ridolpho
-
Thank You to Ridolpho For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
I tried to get some pictures of the proof marks but they turned out pi$$ poor. What I have learned, right or wrong is that it has been worked over a time or two since the time of its production. It has been rebarreled at some point with a No.1 MkIII barrel, has a reshaped military fore stock and a after market butt stock. From the looks of it it seems all repairs are old and were done very well or so it would seem. I did not remove dust cover to find distributor's marks as I did not want to damage it and getting it back on is a nightmare according to some. On the plus side mechanically and even visually it is a pleasing gun to handle. The action and the dust cover along with the trigger guard and magazine have very nice scroll work that looks like an ivy vine. I have been told also that it is a post 1914 manufacture since it lacks the Lee Speed patent markings on the wrist area. So, did I get a pristine Lee Speed? Nah... I knew that going into it. Does it have the been there done that been on the back of an elephant look, yep. NOW comes the question since it is a "bitser". No way I will ever find original parts but do I redo it with new parts to make it look better or leave it alone with its well earned bumps and bruises? Like an old farm tool it was repaired to keep it functional as a working gun, perhaps a guide. According to the family it came out of Africa to the US in the late 40s.
-
Thank You to mtbikerwvu For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Many years ago, a bunch of these, or similar appeared in Australia
.
Several were "De Luxe' models with top ribs on the barrels, fancy express sights, tasteful engraving and stock carving.
The one I found most interesting was the one in 7 x 57 calibre. I suspect that this meant 7 x 57 Rimmed, but who knows.
Most of that collection were marked with "Army and Navy Store" or similar. This was an "outfitter" for enthusiastic military gentlemen. See:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_%2...ted_Kingdom%29
I have heard rumours of them being chambered for 6.5 x 54Rimmed (Dutch / Romanian) as well.
Anyone else seen such critters?
-