1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 31
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #25
    Legacy Member sakorick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    02-28-2021 @ 06:43 AM
    Location
    On my farm in North central Missouri
    Age
    79
    Posts
    498
    Real Name
    Rick Scruggs
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    03:44 AM
    There are several reasons I don't believe this theory and I base my rudimentary knowledge on the fact I held a Supply Officer secondary MOS and went to the Installation Management course at Ft Lee, VA.
    1. Small arms ammunition is a class V supply item. In this regard, it comes under strict storage regulations and transportation security. All class V items were shipped in special sealed containers and in special areas of the ship for safety.
    2. It would seem to be unlikely that of all the magazine manufactures any of them would have the approval to order small arms ammunition and be able to comply with storage security on a large scale.
    3. Magazines are a class II item of supply. Class II are never mixed with class V until issued.
    4. The magazines would have to been shipped to a Ammunition Depot, filled with shells and re-wrapped and marked as Class V, then shipped to the port for deployment to theater. At this point, critical assets (bombs, arty shells, etc.) were given priority and small arms ammunition never was a critical asset.....so it may have sat on the dock for days.
    5. Once in theater, the Material Management Command would have had the authority to have the magazines filled and issued....buy why? By the time he devoted manpower to do this job, the ammo and magazines would already be a unit level ready for issue.
    6. The manpower, complexity and delays in shipment would have in my view been prohibitive.
    7. Finally, when issued to the soldier, he would reload all the shells anyway as no soldier would risk his life on a little old lady in tennis shoes packing his magazines.

    Just my $.02, regards, Rick.

  2. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to sakorick For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Stored Mauser - Bolt in or Out?
    By Aurelius in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-30-2010, 12:41 PM
  2. Loaded magazines?
    By Tom Bowers in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-08-2010, 04:29 PM
  3. Springfield Loaded M1A Quality
    By jeffncs in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-05-2009, 03:52 PM
  4. U.S. Model 1903, loaded question
    By sdh1911 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 03-24-2009, 07:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts