+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: No1 Mk3 mills bomb cup launcher??

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-20-2025 @ 11:18 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,645
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    11:30 AM
    And who exactly said that they were Sect 5 items pray tell Mk7? Where are they EVER described in ANY official document as anything other than a cup discharger?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    04-23-2025 @ 05:08 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,432
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    11:30 AM
    An opinion received by the HBSA from the Home Office in 2000:-

    Queries have been received about the legal status of grenade launcher attachments, one to a K98icon Mauser rifle owned by a Second World War re-enactor and the other acquired by a museum and then seized by H.M. Customs. These are cup-like devices that attach to the barrel of the rifle so that a grenade can be launched from the rifle by the power of a blank round.

    Grenade launchers would be subject to section 5(1A)(c) of the Firearms Act 1968 (as amended) as a launcher designed for firing an unstabilised exploding missile. While the launcher attachment itself would be a (section 1) component part, when it is attached to the rifle it would become a prohibited weapon.

    It is unlikely that any grenades can be found for this launcher and the risk to public safety is minimal.

    We suggest that the owner of a grenade launcher may wish to get it de-activated; there is a Home Office standard for rocket launchers, mortars etc, and the work needed on an attachment of this type would be very limited. This is what we have advised the police to suggest to the two owners of these, and there is no suggestion that anyone is going to be prosecuted.

    We would not be surprised if these items are regarded by some collectors and dealers as accessories, however, they are unusual items and this cannot be a common problem.
    This is a précis of a fax received by our Secretary on 18/2/00 from the Home Office
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    And who exactly said that they were Sect 5 items pray tell Mk7? Where are they EVER described in ANY official document as anything other than a cup discharger?

  3. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 1st variation (test?) 1912 Mills magazine pocket
    By Scott Gahimer in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-24-2012, 12:24 AM
  2. Anyone ever see one of these, Mills sling for Long Lee?
    By rayg in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-15-2012, 08:11 AM
  3. Need help identifying a Mills woven cartridge belt
    By RBruce in forum Vintage Military Gear
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-12-2012, 08:37 PM
  4. Need help identifying a Mills woven cartridge belt
    By RBruce in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-15-2012, 09:11 AM
  5. Mills Holster
    By thorin6 in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 11:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts