+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 48

Thread: Early/ Late SA 1903 Salvageable? Input Needed.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Moderator
    (Milsurp Forums)
    Bill Hollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 12:41 AM
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Oregon
    Posts
    6,132
    Real Name
    Bill Hollinger
    Local Date
    05-17-2025
    Local Time
    12:39 AM
    Thanks fellas for the clarification on the serial number range. I wasn't sure whether it was 800000 or 900000.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Bill Hollinger

    "We're surrounded, that simplifies our problem!"

  2. #2
    Legacy Member HOOKED ON HISTORY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    05-07-2025 @ 06:21 PM
    Location
    MS/USA
    Posts
    4,087
    Local Date
    05-17-2025
    Local Time
    02:39 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Hollinger View Post
    Thanks fellas for the clarification on the serial number range. I wasn't sure whether it was 800000 or 900000.
    Looks as though it is not quite cut and dry. In all likleyhood mine will not be used a great deal but I will "proceede with caution".

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-14-2025 @ 12:52 PM
    Posts
    2,517
    Local Date
    05-17-2025
    Local Time
    02:39 AM
    It is a fact that 800,000 is the "magic number" for SA manufacture. The story goes that Springfield found a small pile of unfinished receivers and put them into the production line after the double heat treatment process had started. Mind you Springfield did not destroy any old receivers and did not re-heat the old recievers, either. I have read the small lot was something like 20-30 recievers, but have no idea where that number comes from and frankly I doubt that fact. But Rick is correct that around 750,000 double heat treating had begun and by 780,000 all new production was double heat treated. But, Springfield still had old receivers/raw forgings in the system and they all went into rifle production. At 800,000 Springfield had all of the old receivers out the door. Or, so they thought.

  5. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Calif-Steve For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-16-2016, 07:48 PM
  2. HRA: What's early, what's late?
    By finloq in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-10-2011, 11:53 PM
  3. New acquisition. Ugly but salvageable I think.
    By Rumpelhardt in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 12-21-2010, 11:40 PM
  4. Springfield M-1. Late January, early February 1942
    By tda003 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-05-2010, 05:10 PM
  5. Here's my late 1898.....input, please...
    By 218bee in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 10:56 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts