+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: Lee Enfield Aluminum stock

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Brit plumber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last On
    06-24-2025 @ 05:50 PM
    Posts
    1,807
    Local Date
    07-11-2025
    Local Time
    10:01 PM
    Rather than these ally bits being a cast copy of the wood forearm, could the ally forearm actually be the pattern to make the wood? I've seen ally patterns where the machine follows the line of it and cuts the wood copy exactly. I wonder if some ones got a hold of some and fitted them to rifles? Just a thought.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    06-20-2025 @ 03:43 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    07-11-2025
    Local Time
    10:01 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Brit plumber View Post
    Rather than these ally bits being a cast copy of the wood forearm, could the ally forearm actually be the pattern to make the wood? I've seen ally patterns where the machine follows the line of it and cuts the wood copy exactly. I wonder if some ones got a hold of some and fitted them to rifles? Just a thought.
    The pattern for No4 butts (in a photo of Long Branch factory) and L1A1 butts (photo from Enfield) show that those patterns were about 200% size scaled.

    I assume that forends were probably cut from at least two patterns - an inside and an outside? Given the type of machinery at the time, i imagine the forends were shaped in multiple operations.

  3. Thank You to Thunderbox For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    07-03-2025 @ 04:23 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,288
    Local Date
    07-12-2025
    Local Time
    07:01 AM
    Today's related trivia:

    SMLE fore ends started out as a long sort-of rectangular block called a "flitch". These were seasoned for years (with any luck) before machining.

    As near as I can understand from the document fragments I have seen, the flitch was trued and then several holes were drilled for clamping and indexing.

    The interior was cut first. This is exactly the same as commercial timber stockmaking; it is a lot easier to hold a square-ish chunk of wood on a router table than it is a fancy shaped one. Commercial fibreglass stocks are built from the outside in; an afternoon at the McMillan factory was most educational.

    The barrel channel, with its taper and all its clearances for sight beds, barrel bands, etc. was rough cut and then a long, specially set up mandrel fitted with all of the odd-shaped cutters was used to form the final channel profile. The excess wood at either end of the flitch was used to hold the fore end when it went into the copy lathe. These could transfer the external profile from a metal "master" to several stocks at a time. If anyone has a copy of the complete process it would make interesting reading. A picture of the actual machine would be nice, too

    Butts were produced similarly. The stepped through-hole for the butt screw and oil bottle were drilled first. This then provided a handy location for the spindle /mandrel that held the butt whilst it was in the copy lathe. I am guessing, but there had to be additional setups for profiling the seat for the buttplate and drilling the hole for the pullthrough weight.

    The handguards were made in a single long piece, then separated using a fine saw. Note that, at least in Australianicon manufacture, there was an allowance for the front handguard to be made with a parallel barrel channel instead of the specified barrel-matching taper. This meant that the front handguard channel could be made by using a router and table instead of a fancy and expensive, long tapered cutter and specialized table. The only downside was that this method resulted in even less timber supporting the front cap than on the standard model. Bonus trivia: the front caps seem to have retained the tiny thread in the mounting holes even when riveting became the normal method of fixing them to the handguard.

    Slazenger (Aust) used the same timber and techniques on the L1A1 furniture; the laminated handguards required a bit of new technology.

  5. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Is This a Colt Aluminum Stock Assembly??
    By Tom in N.J. in forum M16A2/AR15A2 Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-09-2010, 05:42 PM
  2. fa 61 nm aluminum case 30-06
    By 11e40 in forum Range Reports - Show us how good you are!
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-17-2009, 11:12 PM
  3. lc 61 nm aluminum case ?
    By 11e40 in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-01-2009, 10:27 AM
  4. Help!!! Need source for aluminum bolts
    By heckinohio in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 10:44 PM
  5. WW II aluminum knives
    By sdh1911 in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-03-2007, 06:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts