+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Mossberg 42MB(a)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member sakorick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    02-28-2021 @ 06:43 AM
    Location
    On my farm in North central Missouri
    Age
    79
    Posts
    498
    Real Name
    Rick Scruggs
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    04:13 AM
    The 42M-B were issued to the British under the lend lease program. Your MB(a) fell into contract W-478-ORD-3077 which included 5,000 rifles at a cost of $13.49 each, SN's 38001-43000 was your guns range. The (a) designation was given to rifles with the new extractor. Some of the (a) rifles wound up in the British Navy....yours did not. Most of the 42M rifles were sent to Englandicon and stayed there for a period of 2 to 10 years after the war was over. Many rifles(like yours) were modified/sporterized. Your rifle for instance has had the front sight changed at least twice and has what looks to be a Parker Hale aperture on the #4 peep sight. Many of the rifles like yours made it in to the indoor shooting clubs and the silencers were required by range authorities. Many of these rifles were reblued and refinished and I suspect yours was along the line. If you look closely to the proof mark there will be a letter on each side of the crossed lances. If you can tell me what they are I can tell you when it was proofed. You have found a terrific historic rifle and it's a prime example. Regards, Rick.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to sakorick For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member
    Buccaneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    04-06-2025 @ 07:55 AM
    Location
    Cardiff Wales UK
    Posts
    474
    Real Name
    Paul Ellis
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    09:13 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by sakorick View Post
    If you look closely to the proof mark there will be a letter on each side of the crossed lances
    The letters/ numbers appear to be left L right 8 with a 4 at the bottom, I have checked the aperture on the rear sight and it is not marked with any information as to its maker. I realise that the extractors were different hence the (a) so I tried to get a good close up picture of them. Paul
    Last edited by Buccaneer; 12-18-2013 at 05:21 PM.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member sakorick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    02-28-2021 @ 06:43 AM
    Location
    On my farm in North central Missouri
    Age
    79
    Posts
    498
    Real Name
    Rick Scruggs
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    04:13 AM
    The right letter should be a B. The left letter is probably not a L. Can you look with a glass? The 4 is the inspectors mark. None of the apertures were marked, however, it makes not a wit. Many of these Receiver sights were replaced with Parker Hale sights which IMHO are not as nice as the good old #4 Mossy! You should report this rifle on the Mossberg thread of Rimfire Central. I am collecting data on these guns for the Mossberg Collectors Association. With your permission, I will post your rifle in the next quarterly newsletter. Regards, Rick.
    Last edited by sakorick; 12-18-2013 at 05:46 PM.

  6. #4
    Contributing Member
    Buccaneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    04-06-2025 @ 07:55 AM
    Location
    Cardiff Wales UK
    Posts
    474
    Real Name
    Paul Ellis
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    09:13 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by sakorick View Post
    The right letter should be a B. The left letter is probably not a L. Can you look with a glass? The 4 is the inspectors mark.
    I have attached a photo of the mark, the left letter could be a "C" but is not well struck, the right letter is definatly a "B". Please feel free to use any information of pictures, I think I took all of the relivant ones but if you need any more please let me know. Sorry about the grainy appearance of the picture but it is the best I could get it to make it readable. Paul
    Attachment 48094

  7. #5
    Legacy Member sakorick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    02-28-2021 @ 06:43 AM
    Location
    On my farm in North central Missouri
    Age
    79
    Posts
    498
    Real Name
    Rick Scruggs
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    04:13 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Buccaneer View Post
    I have attached a photo of the mark, the left letter could be a "C" but is not well struck, the right letter is definatly a "B". Please feel free to use any information of pictures, I think I took all of the relivant ones but if you need any more please let me know. Sorry about the grainy appearance of the picture but it is the best I could get it to make it readable. Paul
    Attachment 48094
    Your rifle was proofed in 1953 and that is consistent with many of these 1950-1954. I'll include it in the survey. Thanks a million. Regards, Rick.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. New Mossberg 144 LSB
    By Calfed in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-13-2011, 08:25 PM
  2. Mossberg 42MB
    By 8udr in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-23-2011, 06:54 PM
  3. Mossberg 44
    By w4rf in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-29-2009, 05:05 AM
  4. Mossberg 44 help
    By kz1000 in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-13-2009, 02:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts