-
That picture, thread 66, really tickled me Son.... made my afternoon......! And I agree with Son 100% - as Armourers would of course. I agree Mudgee that the job IS well done but yoy ought to qualify that Mudger....... It's certainly fitted will but it ain't shootable unless your head's wel;l back out of harms way. Does that make it well built too?
If you have three blokes shooting a telescopes rifle or ANY rifle and they all get good results it means that you have started off with a good accurate rifle AND three good shooters! That'sall!
-
-
03-08-2014 09:19 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
That picture, thread 66, really tickled me Son.... made my afternoon......! And I agree with Son 100% - as Armourers would of course. I agree Mudgee that the job IS well done but yoy ought to qualify that Mudger....... It's certainly fitted will but it ain't shootable unless your head's wel;l back out of harms way. Does that make it well built too?
If you have three blokes shooting a telescopes rifle or ANY rifle and they all get good results it means that you have started off with a good accurate rifle AND three good shooters! That'sall!
Peter so let me get this straight your saying it has nothing to do with the scope or its mounting to zero at all times once detached and reattached and as mentioned by Son it went back to zero at all times. All rifle and 3 good shooters only you say, all i can say is wow???
Last edited by mudgee; 03-10-2014 at 01:01 AM.
-
Advisory Panel
I think what Peter is trying to say it that the rifle is accurate, and that has nothing to do with the scope. You would expect the same sort of groups, from that rifle, if it had a good aperture sight or a modern scope as long as the mounts are solid and the shooter could do his bit.
Peter, I think what Mudgee is trying to say is that the scope mounting has proven itself to be a good solid set up...
Conversely, if you had three mug shooters, or a barrel with a bulge at the muzzle (extreme case) or the scope did not return to position, hold it's setting or not mounted solid, the groups would have been much larger. Many factors are in play to get the results... any one of which could have ruined the day if it was wrong.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Originally Posted by
Son
I think what Peter is trying to say it that the rifle is accurate, and that has nothing to do with the scope. You would expect the same sort of groups, from that rifle, if it had a good aperture sight or a modern scope as long as the mounts are solid and the shooter could do his bit.
Peter, I think what Mudgee is trying to say is that the scope mounting has proven itself to be a good solid set up...
Conversely, if you had three mug shooters, or a barrel with a bulge at the muzzle (extreme case) or the scope did not return to position, hold it's setting or not mounted solid, the groups would have been much larger. Many factors are in play to get the results... any one of which could have ruined the day if it was wrong.
Thank you Son for putting it so well.
PM
