Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: No5 MK1 questions

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #9
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    03-27-2025 @ 11:44 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    778
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    Ah......, but WHERE did that assumption come from 5th Batt? There's nothing written anywhere and it doesn't appear to be a climatic thing as we had all sorts. And believe me, From my experience it'd seem most strange to go to one cap THEN revert to NO cap, then change to another cap............. and then supply spares later with..... NO cap, contrary to whatever! The 11/55 EMER and drawing shows NO cap. The 7/44 original parts list shows NO cap with the STOCK, fore-end as an assembly of the tie plate and rivet. NO cap and rivet. But amendment 3 dated 5/53 is fore-end assembly with cap, rivet, tie plate and tie plate rivet. But this becomes difficult to decipher as all the part numbers change from the old B1-BJxxx numbers to post-war Ordnance B1-CR numbers.

    To be honest, the caps were just trouble!
    Production of the No5 started in Feb 1944 with the FE prefixed 1000 & the normal production began shortly aftrer in March /April, i have a 4/44 with the serial number 524 with a un-numbered forend & mag, no cap on forend.
    According to the "Bible" in May 1944 a request was made for a cap to be designed to fit the end of the forend & in July 1944 the rounded type was fitted to an experimental rifle & also to some experimental lightened No1s but was found to "difficult to produce" so was changed in September of 1944, there is no mention of this early cap being fitted to production No5s but a photo of one fitted is shown in the book.
    No date is given for the later cap of the type we see but Ian states the rounded cap-less forend appears to be preferred type.
    Nothing really definitive in that but we can see, no cap, cap, no cap in 1944 production.

    When studying the No5 a trend appears showing that the cap appears in earnest in mid 1946 production & as the numbering of the forend was not approved untill Nov 1946 the fitting of salvaged early forends to later No5s & being numbered to the rifle & the fitting of new forends with the cap to early No5s, plus the removal of caps in-service all serve to grey the whole thing but if you look at the No5 survey on SRF you can see the trend.
    All in all, not an absolute & at the end of the day does not really prove anything, but its all we have to work with.
    Surplusrifle Forum View topic - No5 Mk1 Jungle Carbine S/N Survey! - Updated 11.2.2013

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. 1941 Fazakerley No.4 Mk.1 missing pieces - questions, questions, questions....
    By spinecracker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 05:31 PM
  2. 1938 Model Turkish Mauser - questions, questions...
    By spinecracker in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-2010, 10:46 PM
  3. 1973 HXP .303 Mk7z - questions, questions...
    By spinecracker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-05-2010, 12:37 PM
  4. Questions about my M-1
    By FishinMarine09 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-21-2009, 07:19 AM
  5. Questions, Questions Saginaw S'G'
    By Old-Win in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-02-2009, 10:57 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts