+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: no1 MkIII* sporter by PH

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member xcaribooer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Last On
    11-22-2020 @ 12:16 PM
    Location
    lower mainland BC
    Posts
    3
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    06:32 AM
    there are enough ph markings on there to convince me that it was worked on by parker hale especially with the soldered on front ramp saying parker hale. I have looked over quite a few of these over the years and I do not believe all had a ph stamp on the barrel. The only ones I have seen marked parker hale on the barrel for sure are the custom 1 and custom 4,I think this is because the customs were re barreled by ph, the others like supreme and deluxe had the original barrel cut, re blued/polished and a front ramp added, either with screws or solder, I don't believe the supreme or deluxe models nessesarily have PH markings.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by xcaribooer; 10-17-2014 at 04:38 PM.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Steve H. in N.Y.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    04-11-2025 @ 07:14 PM
    Location
    You get one guess
    Posts
    526
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    07:32 AM
    I'm not sure if this helps the discussion any but here's a No.1 "Custom" with a PH scope mount and the wrong magazine which should be a flush-fit unit. Proof date 1963. The stock was made by Sile and the barrel is military. Commercial barrels are identifiable by the lack of a flat on top of the knox form.
    Last edited by Steve H. in N.Y.; 10-18-2014 at 10:00 AM. Reason: added date

  3. Thank You to Steve H. in N.Y. For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member ActionYobbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    10-11-2024 @ 11:03 AM
    Location
    Flippin Arky
    Posts
    417
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    07:32 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by xcaribooer View Post
    there are enough ph markings on there to convince me that it was worked on by parker hale especially with the soldered on front ramp saying parker hale.
    these sight ramps and other parker hale parts were available to any one who wanted to purchase them. so just because the sight has parkerhale on it just means they made the sight. I had 2 new PH sight ramps in my parts box along with several other PH marked parts that I acquired from a gunsmith in Sydney NSW in 1991.


    Quote Originally Posted by xcaribooer View Post
    I don't believe the supreme or deluxe models nessesarily have PH markings.
    I have only had 2 PH built rifles one a No4 and the other a TX1200 and they both had PH stamps on them
    1ATSR 177AD & 4/3 RNSWR

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. No. I MkIII*(H) Sporter
    By Ridolpho in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-15-2014, 06:19 AM
  2. What is the difference between a MkIII* and a MkIII?
    By EnfieldNutt84 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-11-2010, 11:09 PM
  3. Possible NBA Sporter?
    By mkbenenson in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-09-2009, 03:49 PM
  4. NRA Sporter
    By JGaynor in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-01-2009, 04:21 PM
  5. Churchill sporter No1 mkIII
    By kell2784 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-07-2007, 11:24 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts