It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !
Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.
I have the book about the whole conjecture. Small but a hard cover, I wouldn't part with it...they sure make the last part look neat but that wasn't what happened, the witnesses describe it differently.
Last edited by browningautorifle; 11-25-2014 at 08:50 PM.
I remember reading a book about WWI fighter pilots many years ago and I can't remember the title. It was descriptive in the types of controls each plane had plus comments of actual pilots on the pro's and con's of the planes they flew. I remember a couple of humorous points like the French mounted a machine gun on the landing gear axle then asked for volunteers to try it out. The rumor of the time was the recoil would slow the plane to the extent it would fall from the sky. A comment made by the Baron himself was the first thing he did after landing his plane was to seek out the latrine. The fuel, he stated, was blended with castor oil to help lube the engine and it was used to prevent his machine guns from jamming in the frigid air. Ingesting the fumes worked as a laxative and made concentration on the fight difficult. I wish I could find that book again as it contained a lot of tidbits of forgotten lore of the fighter pilots. It covered both the heroics of the pilots as well as day to day life. It was published in the early 20's as I remember.
Another little fact was that the engines that looked like radials were actually rotary engines - the propeller was bolted to the engine block. The whole engine rotated around a fixed crankshaft mounted to the firewall. The whole affair, with all that engine mass in motion, contributed to generous centrifugal effect, causing the plane to resist directional change. It also caused unexpected torque behavior in the roll axis - a roll with the direction of the engine was aided by the motion of the engine and a roll against the motion of the engine was resisted. Adding or removing power at low speed or on the ground could be fraught with unexpected torque results as well in a hard-to-recover situation. On the Fokker Dr.1, wingtip skids were added to help protect on takeoff and landing. As a result of these odd characteristics and because the rotary engines weren't that successful a design from the start, most reproductions use radial engines in place of the rotaries. A plus was that these engines cooled rather well.
Probably the largest group of DR.1s in the world is living down the road from me at the Military Aviation Museum.
Bob
Last edited by Bob Womack; 11-26-2014 at 07:10 PM.
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "
Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring
PM
Originally Posted by Trap4570
