Lest we forget - canadian grave

[Eaglelord17]

And of course, there is the largest issue of all: Why was the war fought in the first place? It wasn't good versus evil, like the second world war, or over economics or philosophy; maybe it was territory, but why didn't peace negotiations start earlier? The common answer as to "why" is "entangling alliances." I say it was people got caught in the frenzy of war -- sensibility got lost, lives meant little to the generals, and the old methods were slow to be replaced (unlike the second world war).

Two points, first off WWI I believe was mostly caused by the fact people wanted to go to war and expand there empires, nationalism was very strong and the idea of owning colonies was very popular. WWI could have easily been avoided, in fact early on just before the war started it looked like it was avoided. There was tons of negotiations before WWI to avoid it, I recommend looking at 'The Great War' channel on youtube to get a good idea of the extent of negotiations which were happening before the war began (it would be the earliest episodes).

WWI was a situation everyone was unprepared for. Looking back in hindsight it is easy to say they were stupid as the tactics that were to be developed in the war became the standard now, but if you look at it with a proper 19th century perspective you will see how hard it would have been to adapt to that style of warfare when literally everything you have been taught has become obsolete.

Secondly WWII was not a 'good and evil' war. It is the line most people are fed, but if you actually look at the objectives of the Axis powers, you will see that WWII was fought for mostly the same reasons WWI was. Creating a empire (or restoring one), being the primary reason for all Axis powers to fight. The Allies never even won WWII, we went to war to protect Poland's sovereignty, and when the war was over Poland still wasn't liberated.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Seaspriter]

it is easy to say they were stupid as the tactics that were to be developed in the war became the standard now, but if you look at it with a proper 19th century perspective you will see how hard it would have been to adapt to that style of warfare when literally everything you have been taught has become obsolete.

I visited the Gettysburg National Park last summer to see where my great great grandfather fought for the Massachusetts 8th Regiment. Most of the same blunders made in 1863 were perpetuated in WWI, but to an even larger extent. WWI was a stalemate over a few miles of front for years; at least the American Civil War had more mobility.

WWII was not a 'good and evil' war. It is the line most people are fed, but if you actually look at the objectives of the Axis powers, you will see that WWII was fought for mostly the same reasons WWI was.

If you study psychopathy, quickly you come to realize the WWII was started and fought by the Axis powers for psychopathic motives more than anything else. Certainly any war can be justified by revisionist historians as being fought for economic reasons, but the reality is that empires and colonies and greed have existed since before Greco-Roman times but have not always resulted in war. Psychopathic behavior (which is evil by definition) was exhibited by Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Stalin, and later by Mao and the North Koreans. Whenever genocide shows up in war, it's the result of psychopathics in control. During the 20th century, over 100 million people died at the hands of the twisted minds of psychopaths. During WWII, the Allies fought a "Good War" against some of the most evil minds to team up in history. Certainly there were economics and empires, but during WWII Franklin Roosevelt pretty much made Churchill give up on a colonial strategy in return for US war support.

[Eaglelord17]

I visited the Gettysburg National Park last summer to see where my great great grandfather fought for the Massachusetts 8th Regiment. Most of the same blunders made in 1863 were perpetuated in WWI, but to an even larger extent. WWI was a stalemate over a few miles of front for years; at least the American Civil War had more mobility.

Many people like to bring up the American Civil War as a example of why didn't they learn from this. The reality is that based on later wars there was no need to. Look at the Franco-Prussian War for some very mobile warfare with the earlier technology. Other later wars such as the Boer War and such also happened to stick in the minds of the generals of the time for the need for long range combat. Probally the best chance anyone had to learn how to fight with the modern technology was the Russo-Japanese War. Dug in Russian troops were able to deal tons of damage to Japanese troops, but the lessons that could have been learned were ignored.

There were some mobile parts of WWI, the big two areas being the Russian front, and the war in Africa, everyone just seems to focus on the Western front however as it tends to be the area most people are interested in. Most people don't even remember the Balkans or the struggles that took place in that area.

If you study psychopathy, quickly you come to realize the WWII was started and fought by the Axis powers for psychopathic motives more than anything else. Certainly any war can be justified by revisionist historians as being fought for economic reasons, but the reality is that empires and colonies and greed have existed since before Greco-Roman times but have not always resulted in war. Psychopathic behavior (which is evil by definition) was exhibited by Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Stalin, and later by Mao and the North Koreans. Whenever genocide shows up in war, it's the result of psychopathics in control. During the 20th century, over 100 million people died at the hands of the twisted minds of psychopaths. During WWII, the Allies fought a "Good War" against some of the most evil minds to team up in history. Certainly there were economics and empires, but during WWII Franklin Roosevelt pretty much made Churchill give up on a colonial strategy in return for US war support.

WWII was just WWI fought with modern tactics. The goals were primarily to restore power to the Axis powers. Japans goal was to create the co-prosperity sphere, which is empire building. Italy's goals were to create a empire for itself out of Libya, Ethiopia, Egypt etc. Germany's goals were to retake land that was historically theres (Austria is German speaking, Czechslovakia being formerly part of Germany and Austria-Hungary, Poland being historically part of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia etc.). You could even argue that Germany never really intended to fight France that early (or at all, we will never know however).

All three of these nations were late to the empire game, both Germany and Italy being founded in the late 1800s and Japan not coming out of isolation until the late 1800s. Other nations that joined the Axis, (primarily Balkan nations) were all trying to get a bit ahead in the area as they all had land claims which hadn't been resolved (and likely never will be).

In terms of the Allies there goals were primarily to stop these nations from empire building as a fair bit of the land they wanted belonged to the Allies. The US is unique in that it stayed uninvolved for a long time, but that is also because they really didn't care about some other European war. It wasn't until the war was literally brought to your doorstep that the Americans joined.

Yes the Axis committed some atrocities, but there goals were not to commit atrocities, its just something they did on the side (in the case of the Germans, most people were unaware of the internment camps and what went on there). The allies were also guilty of some as well, though people don't like to put the spotlight on them. The extent is not nearly as great as say the Germans or the Japanese, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen on both sides. You have to remember when WWII started and carried on, the western world was unaware of any atrocities being committed, it wasn't until it was over that they were discovered.

[henry r]

the american oil embargo on japan certainly helped ensure america's inclusion in ww2.