+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: a question about Myths and Truths of No.1 EY Rifles (by Peter Laidler)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 10:45 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,548
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    05:06 PM
    I think this point came up recently in another thread. The Indians produced modified forends for the SMLE later on in which the stock bolt keeper plate was dispensed with & a simple tie plate as per the No4 Mk1 forend was used. This also meant that the simplified (no squared off bit on the front end) No4 stock bolt could be employed. As mentioned above though, a Thackray type spring washer was required to tension it all.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 05-05-2016 at 02:38 PM. Reason: typo

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Legacy Member Sentryduty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 11:09 AM
    Location
    Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Posts
    1,057
    Real Name
    Darren
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    09:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    The Indians produced modified forends for the SMLE later on in which the stock bolt keeper plate was dispensed with & a simple tie plate as per the No4 Mk1 forend was used. This also meant that the simplified (no squared off bit on the front end) No4 stock bolt could be employed.
    My "de-sporter" 1918 No1 Mk 3 project rifle employs one of these exact stock sets and bolts, I was a bit concerned that I might have damaged something during my assembly when the square stock bolt discussion came up as I could not remember observing anything of the sort. I disassembled the rifle and happily discovered I had one of the later Indian sets as you describe.
    - Darren
    1 PL West Nova Scotia Regiment 2000-2003
    1 BN Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry 2003-2013

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Sentryduty For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    07-04-2025 @ 03:55 AM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    778
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    04:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    I think this point came up recently in another thread. The Indians produced modified forends for the SMLE later on in which the stock bolt keeper plate was dispensed with & a simple tie plate as per the No4 Mk1 forend was used. This also meant that the simplified (no squared off bit on the front end) No4 stock bolt could be employed. As mentioned above though, a Thackray type spring washer was required to tension it all.
    The Indians did away with the keeper plate before the introduction of the tie plate & simply put a spring washer on the stockbolt, externally the forend looked the same as any Britishicon or Australianicon made rifle.
    The forend on my 1927 Ishapore, it is numbered to the rifle but cant guarantee the forend dates to 1927 as it could have been replaced

    Last edited by 5thBatt; 05-05-2016 at 05:07 PM.

  6. The Following 7 Members Say Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Myths and Truths of No.1 EY Rifles (by Peter Laidler)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-08-2009, 07:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts