Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: a question about Myths and Truths of No.1 EY Rifles (by Peter Laidler)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #6
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    03-27-2025 @ 11:44 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    778
    Local Date
    05-26-2025
    Local Time
    02:20 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    I think this point came up recently in another thread. The Indians produced modified forends for the SMLE later on in which the stock bolt keeper plate was dispensed with & a simple tie plate as per the No4 Mk1 forend was used. This also meant that the simplified (no squared off bit on the front end) No4 stock bolt could be employed. As mentioned above though, a Thackray type spring washer was required to tension it all.
    The Indians did away with the keeper plate before the introduction of the tie plate & simply put a spring washer on the stockbolt, externally the forend looked the same as any Britishicon or Australianicon made rifle.
    The forend on my 1927 Ishapore, it is numbered to the rifle but cant guarantee the forend dates to 1927 as it could have been replaced

    Last edited by 5thBatt; 05-05-2016 at 05:07 PM.

  2. The Following 7 Members Say Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Myths and Truths of No.1 EY Rifles (by Peter Laidler)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-08-2009, 07:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts