-
Legacy Member
effect on value question on 1903a3?
Hello, New guy here with first question to milsurps.com..
I recently acquired a real nice Remington 1903-A3 from a local shop. So a buddy of mine who is a lot more knowledgeable on the WW1/2 rifles than I look it over. He goes on talking how I should change the incorrect parts to correct parts.
Prior to buying I did study up on stamped vs milled parts, stocks, barrels, butt plates etc.
Now rifle in question has had a arsenal rebuild.
My question would making the rifle correct to pre-arsenal rebuild effect the value. It has some cartouche stamps to show it has had a arsenal rebuild.
Mine has a 1903 trigger/mag plate assembly on it currently. Is it worth it to switch to a correct Remington trigger/mag assembly.
Yes having a 100% correct from the create rifle would be great, But then to me takes away from the nostalgic heritage of the rifle. Honestly I am torn between making it all correct small ocd issue or leave it as is.
Once I get the camera figured out, I will post some pics of the rifle with more questions.
Thank you for the input,
Snert..
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
12-15-2016 10:50 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
I hate to sound like I'm "fence-sitting" but it sort of depends:
1) If you're missing one part, I don't see a problem - I don't know if it'll affect the value one way or the other.
2) If the rifle has been totally rebuilt and refinished, I think it a waste of time
3) My "rule of thumb" for M1903s (not M1903A3s) is if the rifle is missing the fixed rear sight base and/or the front sight and has been drilled and tapped, it is not worth the effort and expense.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
--George Orwell
-
-
-
Legacy Member
This one seems pretty complete and not drilled, 100% the way it was made. Well with the exception of a few swapped parts mainly the trigger guard. On the front sight the band/base is marked R while the pinned in blade has a C stamped in it. I will try to post pictures this weekend and you guys could give it the once over.
plus there is a cartouche I am curious about on the stock.
-
-
Pictures would really help. Thanks!
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
--George Orwell
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Snert
100% the way it was made. Well with the exception of a few swapped parts
Yes, pics when you can...
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
If it has the arsenal stamps in the wood leave as is, still a great rifle with history. In order of collectibility and value it goes like this
1) original/correct
2) arsenal rebuild
3) refinished or restored
4) bubbafied/sporter
If it has the rebuild stamps in the stock I see no point correcting it, unless your going to find another stock
-
Legacy Member
So I took a bunch of pictures to post, BUT having a issue with a photo host. I know this is off topic but who do you recommend? Looking for least pop-ups and simple to use with forum size upload option.
I tried tinypic and it is super slow to just get from one step to the next. I hear photobucket is horrible now too with ads/pop-ups.
-
-
Advisory Panel
PM me and we can talk, I'll send you an Email address and you mail them to me so I can post them for you.
-
-
Legacy Member
Jim, Let my try first if no success then I will take you up on your offer.
Here we go..
-
Thank You to Snert For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
-