+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: SKS and accuracy

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:23 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,288
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    09:01 PM
    As for a scope mounting system:

    A good start is a simple section of 2" x 2" mild-steel angle, bolted to the left-hand side of the receiver / body.

    The top area is trimmed to a width to ensure ejection clearance. (More on that issue later). Then a "rail" or pads of your choosing are obtained.

    The "vertical" part of the angle is set to clear the woodwork and then goes for drilling and counter-sinking. At least THREE, preferably four, holes need to be drilled for the attachment of the "mount" The steel in some of these little beauties is often "tough"; but not glass -hard like a P-14 body. You will need good, SHARP taps and a good cutting fluid. Thread spec is your choice. This may be determined by what sort of grade 6 or better CS cap-screws you can obtain. The truly hard-core will also whack in a couple of high-grade tapered pins to stop the mount "floating" on the screws.

    That sounds like a lot of fiddling around on a "cheap" rifle, but it works. One final consideration is the ejection angle. A "shooting buddy" did a similar job and was somewhat distraught at the effect of ejected STEEL cases striking the objective bell of his scope. His solution was to weld an "extension shield" onto the front of the angle-steel mount.

    Or, you can skip all of that and just fit one of those very lightweight "red-dot" reflex sight to the standard rear-sight base with a suitable "interface".

    If you are bouncing about in the farm 4WD, culling feral pigs, thousands of dollars worth of exotic AR or similar, is just being excessively "Gucci". A 124gn SP from a $400 rig kills them just as dead.

    A removable cheek-piece, a la the No4T style, also helps with the ergonomics of the set-up.

    Experimental "gun-plumbing", on the cheap.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Bruce_in_Oz; 06-06-2017 at 07:12 PM.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:13 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,164
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    04:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_in_Oz View Post
    That sounds like a lot of fiddling
    I'm afraid I do see it as a lot, but I'd leave the sights as is. Most around here just thunder the ammo through and fine accuracy doesn't seem to matter much. Two guys will take a case of ammo to the range and go through all of it...in an hour.
    Regards, Jim

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. No. 5 Accuracy
    By Ridolpho in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 01-31-2016, 09:55 PM
  2. Testing a 4T's accuracy
    By Rwsgunsmithing in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-09-2015, 01:07 PM
  3. Getting the most accuracy from a No. 4 MK1*
    By sigman2 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-25-2014, 04:02 AM
  4. 2a accuracy
    By simo99 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-05-2013, 05:35 AM
  5. No.1 Mk3 accuracy question
    By newcastle in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-25-2010, 02:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts