+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: T3 with Non infrared scope? Fact or fiction?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member jdmcomp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last On
    01-27-2025 @ 07:49 PM
    Location
    E. Tenn
    Posts
    150
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    08:51 AM
    Thread Starter
    Yep, there is one in ever crowd. I am not making the claim, I merely posit the claim.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    firstflabn
    Guest firstflabn's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by jdmcomp View Post
    Yep, there is one in ever crowd. I am not making the claim, I merely posit the claim.
    Please try to stay on the subject. Your snide remark directed at me personally is inappropriate.

    Why didn't you ask the "source" of the claim for the evidence you now want? Provide info to get info.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    02-12-2025 @ 05:16 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    01:51 PM
    So I can calm things down, the M3 did in fact have such equipment fitted during the Korean War used by Australianicon troops and during WW2. The forerunner for the Starlight scope presumably!
    Fight at Night: U.S Army Night Vision 1945-1980
    Last edited by Gil Boyd; 08-15-2017 at 10:57 AM.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

  5. Thank You to Gil Boyd For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Legacy Member jdmcomp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last On
    01-27-2025 @ 07:49 PM
    Location
    E. Tenn
    Posts
    150
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    08:51 AM
    Thread Starter
    My apology, it was said in jest and nothing more. And i did explain that I do not have skin in the game, just looking for facts/sources. After all if I had a source then there is nothing to discuss.

  7. Thank You to jdmcomp For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    firstflabn
    Guest firstflabn's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by jdmcomp View Post
    My apology, it was said in jest and nothing more. And i did explain that I do not have skin in the game, just looking for facts/sources. After all if I had a source then there is nothing to discuss.
    We're good. I appreciate it. If we were face to face, the identical statements accompanied by a wry smile or a wink wouldn't even be noticed. This kite string and paper cup communication method has its limitations.

    I'm still in the dark on what you base your theory on, so I have to cover all the weak points.

    First, it's pretty safe to say the batch of 811 T3s did not go to the South Pacific (with or without conventional optics) - unless it was for storage. The SPA had been officially redesignated a supply zone 5-10 months before these 811 were produced. Not much call for a new toy in a quiet area. If your sources suggest they did, I would have qualms about relying on any other claims from the same source.

    Second, why do I think the 811 T3s didn't go to the SPA during WWII under any scenario, regardless of how unlikely? Because they went somewhere else. I have a 31 Aug 45 Ordnance report showing that during the first 6 months of 1945, 809 T3s were sent to the Corps of Engineers (presumably for Sniperscope electronics installation) and the other 2 went somewhere in the Zone of the Interior (likely either for testing, or maybe photographing for FMs, PR, etc.)

    I don't think anyone would posit that the Engineers were authorized to install conventional scopes on any Ordnance equipment. Had the 809 T3s somehow gone to the Engineers, then a change of plan occurred and they were sent back to Ordnance for conventional scope installation, that transfer would show up on this report. No such indication occurs.

    My guess is these 809 sat around stateside with the Engineers waiting for the M2 Sniperscope electronics design to be approved and the equipment manufactured - and then the war ended. I would refer you to CCNL 368 for details on the ones that got used on Okinawa. No evidence has been presented on use in the Philippines other than the 50 sent to the SW Pacific Area for training sometime around late Sept 44. These are clearly not from the 811.

    What happened after V-E Day is outside my research interest, so I'll leave that to others.

  9. Thank You to firstflabn For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. T3/M3 Infrared Scope lamp question
    By Kaydee in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-03-2017, 03:18 PM
  2. Well, here's another piece of creative fiction!
    By mrclark303 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 05-15-2017, 01:35 AM
  3. WWII Navy US/C-3 Infrared Signaling Telescope
    By subijitsu in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-04-2012, 07:36 PM
  4. Infrared Heat Seekers disposal?
    By Julie in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-28-2010, 11:29 PM
  5. M3 infrared night scope
    By big4jim in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-08-2009, 07:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts