+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: No4 mk1 , (F) Date1/49, PF 73,382

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Strangely Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 04:17 AM
    Location
    Wiltshire UK
    Age
    73
    Posts
    576
    Real Name
    Mick Kelly
    Local Date
    05-05-2025
    Local Time
    09:53 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by harry mac View Post
    Why do we assume that the action bodies supplied by Faz were already serial numbered? Could they not have been supplied un-numbered for PH, Fultons etc. to apply a number from the allocated block, once they'd built rifles on them?
    Possibly Harry, hence the early date.
    I think where I am at odds with this one; would ROF Fazackerley have just put a date on and no serial number?

    My example in post 11 clearly shows the date and number being put on by the same hand, which incidentally all of these examples have much larger numerals.
    Which I think confirms a date must have been put on a receiver before leaving the ROF. I guess we might not ever know the answer to this!
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Mick

  2. Thank You to Strangely Brown For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    02-12-2025 @ 05:16 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    05-05-2025
    Local Time
    08:53 AM
    Even in the days of Yore, numbers were for counting, and thats the form we are all used to as human beings, especially when it comes to weapons of any type..................so it follows, numbers at the very least would have been there to be able to statistically record how many were produced IMHO.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

  4. Thank You to Gil Boyd For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member harry mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-28-2024 @ 05:34 PM
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    471
    Local Date
    05-05-2025
    Local Time
    09:53 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Strangely Brown View Post
    Possibly Harry, hence the early date.
    I think where I am at odds with this one; would ROF Fazackerley have just put a date on and no serial number?

    My example in post 11 clearly shows the date and number being put on by the same hand, which incidentally all of these examples have much larger numerals.
    Which I think confirms a date must have been put on a receiver before leaving the ROF. I guess we might not ever know the answer to this!
    Mick, I'd say it makes more sense to keep action bodies un-numbered until they are complete rifles. If you were to number them first, and part way through assembly a rifle was found to be defective, or a machining process was messed up and ruined it, you'd end up with a gap in the serial number run. If you only number them once they are complete rifles, a run of 50 sequential serial numbers equals fifty rifles. It makes accounting easier.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts