+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Dumbest Bayonet Ever

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:02 AM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    7,585
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    06-20-2025
    Local Time
    04:09 AM
    Thread Starter
    The Johnson bayonet in and of itself does not look bad. Perhaps simply the concept of putting it on a recoiling barrel.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to Aragorn243 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:45 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,140
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    06-20-2025
    Local Time
    01:09 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Aragorn243 View Post
    the concept of putting it on a recoiling barrel.
    I agree with all of that.
    Regards, Jim

  4. #3
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:39 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,470
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-20-2025
    Local Time
    03:09 AM

    rod and blade bayonets

    My photo shows a Springfield 1903 rod bayoneyt and the Model 1905 bayonet.

    The rod bayonet was also used on some late Springfield trap door rifle in 45-70 too

    The Johnson rifle barrel could not support any type of "normal" bayonet and had to
    use something that keep the rifle in operationAttachment 90528

  5. #4
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    06-18-2025 @ 09:10 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,054
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    06-20-2025
    Local Time
    04:09 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Aragorn243 View Post
    The Johnson bayonet in and of itself does not look bad. Perhaps simply the concept of putting it on a recoiling barrel.
    Unfortunately the US Ordnance Department has a military specification for a bayonet on its combat rifles. It does not have to look pretty but it must work. Having started my military career in the twilight age of the wood and steel rifle. It was practical to have a bayonet on a rifle especially in hand to hand combat where you can also butt stroke your opponent. Today try that with an M16icon rifle you will have a one shot two piece rifle.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-01-2014, 09:48 PM
  2. 1867 complete bayonet set plus bayonet and case
    By 1History in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-09-2013, 04:28 AM
  3. Need a bayonet lug for a G33/40 anyone have one
    By haddon1 in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-25-2010, 12:45 PM
  4. bayonet lug during ww2
    By lboos in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-28-2009, 08:24 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts