One of the basic checks for originality, which does not require any expert knowledge of the artefact being investigated, is:
Are wear patterns, scratches, machining marks etc. consistent?
Inconsistency is the biggest giveaway when items are modified, falsified, or downright faked.
So the inconsistency, which quite rightly caught your attention and distrurbs you, is in this case an indication that a (possibly genuine) sniper scope has been retrospectively fitted to a non-sniper rifle, in order to upvalue it in the eyes of an undiscerning buyer.
In particular, while a used rifle that showed superior performance may have been selected for alteration to a sniper configuration by fitting a scope, the scope in such a case would be new.
The other way around: fitting an well-used scope to a new rifle, strikes me as being extremely implausible as an official (i.e. arsenal/base workshop) operation.
Take some photos, post them here, and let's all have a look!Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.