-
Legacy Member
Just re-read this string. I am not referring to strength of the 1945 Kar98k. They are usually very strong. But the 1945 production has its own collector fans. Shooting the rifle MAY devalue it. A good shooter would be a 1938-42 Kar98k. But only from a collector view. It is true German armor steel declined in late 1944 and caused problems for tank steel, but as far as I know this was not the case for rifle production. I have owned only one 1945 Kar98k, as they tend to be few and far between. Just take good care of it and good luck.
-
-
05-23-2019 02:24 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
"...from a collector view..." There are collectors who want one K98 from every year of manufacture.
I doubt there was any difference in QC between 1939 Oberndorf rifles and 1945 Oberndorf rifles. Slave labour or not.
The Germans made more stuff in 1945 than they did in 1940. Just in underground factories. Despite the 24 hours of bombing.
Spelling and Grammar count!
-
-
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Reference the Gloster Meteor:
My godfather, Denis Powell, was a RAF fighter pilot, first on Spitfires and then Mosquitos and finally on the Meteors before war's end. The Meteors were not allowed to cross the channel until very near the war's end for security reasons. The concern being the risk of their technology being divulged if one had been lost and fell into German hands. For that reason, they were initially used to intercept and shoot down or 'tip over' V-1s by coming alongside, getting a wingtip under the stub wing of the V-1 and tip it over. The V-1s would explode once they went inverted.
That was something he did to earn the King's shilling back then.
-
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
Fruler
Why would you not consider looking at a 1945 for a shooter? Is it more collectable? I figured the way this things looks it would be less desirable.
The late war 45 stuff has their own devotees among K98 collectors, so can be just as collectible.
The actions were just as strong, they cut back on stamped items on later guns, where they could, like the barrel bands etc.
-
-
Legacy Member
Late War Kriegsmodell K98
See here for comprehensive info on the Kriegsmodell and Semi-Kriegsmodell versions of the K98 made in the last 6 months of the war.
http://www.latewar.com/
-
-
Legacy Member
Excellent information guys. I ended up getting a much cheaper k98k from a local guy for $450. Russian capture... Interestingly the only serial number that matches is the stock to the receiver. Other than that, not a single matching number. Shoots great... 1944 dot made. I dont care about the lack of matching numbers, just wanted an example of a k98k to shoot. Only complaint is from the seller. Told me when i bought it he took it out shooting the day before.... The idiot used corrosive ammo, so after about a week of sitting i noticed rust appearing on the bolt... Ran a patch and brus h down the bore and sure enough, rusty... Got the rust out, all is well now. Sanded rust of bolt with very fine grade sandpaper i had laying around. I do like the 100 yard sights... Compared to my enfield that has a 300 and 600 yards sight. Rifle is dead on at 50 and 100 yards... Luckily over the past 75 years someone took the time to zero the rifle. Thanks guys for the information, very appreciated.
I own a bunch of milsurp but a few of my favorites are my Lithgow smle 1942, Argentine 1909 engineer Mauser carbine and my newest favorite, my Swiss K11... It's a special rifle with a troop tag and the most accurate I own.
-
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
amadeus76
They cut corners on the stock, cleaning rod, and finish, not on the strength of the action... Doing so would be the most counter productive thing they could have done.
You always hear about this crap, but I’ve yet to see any documented proof that any of the last ditch rifles from either Germany or
Japan were unsafe fire or that the actions were significantly less strong than pre-war examples.
I agree with you. I doubt Germany, Japan, or even Russia for that matter sent any troops out with dangerous rifles, straight from the factory... Doesn't make sense to, in fact it's counter productive. Omitting things such as cleaning rods, bayonet lugs etc was a good idea IMO... They wouldn't have won the war anyways but I think from the beginning the "war model" should have been the standard from day one of adoption of the k98k. If the average German soldier had time to clean his rifle on the eastern front, or lived long enough on to have had that opportunity, a cheap pull through bore snake wouldve been ideal, like what was used on the Enfield. SO... Yeah, from my understanding there was never a short supply of quality steel... Most of it came from Sweden. I think the problem was getting it to where it needed to be... Basically most all armament plants were bombed. If any gun that i would expect a KABOOM from would be a war time mosin, in any variation... But i dont ever remember hearing of any KABOOMS with those. I'm just impressed with my K98k action. 3 locking lugs... 8mm mauser... it would take a seriously over pressured load to blow my 1944 dot Russ capture. The one i ended up buying has been shot a lot. Totally rebuilt by the russians. Only matching number is the stock. Im also impressed with the accuracy of the rifle... But ive only shot it out to 100 yards with irons. Thanks for replying!!!
I own a bunch of milsurp but a few of my favorites are my Lithgow smle 1942, Argentine 1909 engineer Mauser carbine and my newest favorite, my Swiss K11... It's a special rifle with a troop tag and the most accurate I own.
-