+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Japanese Handguns

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jim K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-01-2009 @ 03:41 PM
    Posts
    505
    Local Date
    06-06-2025
    Local Time
    05:28 PM
    The early guns were well made and finished to the equivalent of, say, Germanicon civilian Lugers. I will stack a Baby Nambu up against the best of European guns any day for fit and finish.

    The designs are not bad, but the reality was that the Japaneseicon national pride led them (especially Nambu) to put a lot of effort into designing arms that were uniquely Japanese, rather than simply copying foreign ideas as they had done earlier (and afterwards). Whether that approach is good or bad, it precludes use of some good ideas.

    Perhaps the best word for those designs is "clever", but there was innovation. I think some of those ideas could have been used later, but they were not. (Example: The Type 14 design could have been used in a center-fire pistol based on the Ruger Standard Model.)

    Even the much despised Type 94 actually shows considerable thought as to manufacturing a pistol using a combination of common tooling and fine handwork. And of course, all Japanese arms deteriorated in quality as the war went on, though essentials, like proper hardening, were maintained to near the end.

    Were the Japanese pistols good? Not really. They have too many problems, like continual firing pin breakage on the Type 14. But some of their "problems" were just the strange appearance and the American idea that anything that does not look like a Model 1911A1 just has to be junk.

    Jim
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member enbloc8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-21-2025 @ 11:44 AM
    Posts
    237
    Local Date
    06-06-2025
    Local Time
    04:28 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim K View Post
    the reality was that the Japaneseicon national pride led them (especially Nambu) to put a lot of effort into designing arms that were uniquely Japanese, rather than simply copying foreign ideas as they had done earlier (and afterwards). Whether that approach is good or bad, it precludes use of some good ideas.
    With that in mind, I always find it a little ironic that many Japanese officers who did carry pistols (and many did not) chose European or American pistols for their sidearms.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. WWII Handguns
    By AlReiter in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-25-2009, 06:05 PM
  2. expert on Swedish Air Force handguns
    By rooster in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-13-2009, 12:33 PM
  3. British Military Handguns....1854-1954
    By Warren in forum Book and Video Review Corner
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-26-2007, 09:06 AM
  4. FS/FT: Several Beautiful Milsurp Handguns and Rifles (CGN Private Ad)
    By Badger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-09-2007, 05:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts