+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Rem 1903

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Dave 10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Last On
    07-31-2020 @ 09:53 PM
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    14
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    04:14 AM
    Thread Starter
    I did .It was the 395.00 one ,now 495.00. they said thats how they got them. I got the post war"unissued"one with cross bolts because thats what style was on the rifle although cut down. And I was told that was correct for my serial#. I just found it weird that the original even though cut at second band ,seems so much heavier. While on subject .Anyone know the difference between Sarco and Numrich type C repros?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member bml's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Last On
    06-30-2025 @ 11:19 PM
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    17
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    01:14 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave 10 View Post
    I did .It was the 395.00 one ,now 495.00. they said thats how they got them. I got the post war"unissued"one with cross bolts because thats what style was on the rifle although cut down. And I was told that was correct for my serial#. I just found it weird that the original even though cut at second band ,seems so much heavier. While on subject .Anyone know the difference between Sarco and Numrich type C repros?
    Sarco walnut C stocks are nice wood but the inletting is horribly wrong behind the recoil lug. The A3 hand guards for them are hit or miss if they are even finished profiled right. It is like their stocks and hand guards were the mistakes from the stock factory.

    Numrich C stock I recently picked up was a Minnelli with Italianicon walnut. The hand guard they sent to match it was American walnut, not a Minnelli. Inletting was ok but still not correct at the rear of the trigger guard. It was stepped instead of radiused where the guard beds.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Early 1903 NRA Sporter or Sporterized 1903 Forgery ??
    By msup13 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-24-2020, 12:54 PM
  2. Two Questions: Model 1903 Designation and Butt Plate Type for RIA 1903
    By USMA79 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-24-2018, 08:28 AM
  3. SRS Check 1903 Dated 1926 NM 1903 Serial # 1272809
    By samnev in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-31-2013, 12:01 PM
  4. Hey all 1903 Lovers : See July 20 Shotgun News 1903 Springfield Article
    By tomwatts in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-15-2012, 04:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts