Barrel length

[englishman_ca]

Ya, some coincidences with the barrels.

The cavalry carbine was a lightened arm for the horse soldier. The lightweight barrel was slender but fully protected by stock, hand guard and nose cap. Introduced 1894.

Introduced nine years later in 1903, the muzzle diameter on the Sht.LE is much the same as the slender carbine barrel. Take a carbine barrel and stretch it by 4-1/2 inches and you have an SMLE barrel. Coincidently also protected by a stock, hand guard and nose cap.

Then the black magic with the barrel harmonics to get the Sht.LE to shoot and compensate. Spring loaded inner center band, then a spring loaded centering shoe in the nose cap. The long Lee had none of that, just a heavy stiff barrel.

The heavy barrel created for competition use with the SMLE is basically a long Lee barrel shortened. Which coincidentally would be the same as the No.4 barrel. Eeek! Coincidentally, the barrel diameters and taper on the No.4 rifle is pretty much the same as that of a cut down long Lee.

What does all this mean? I have no idea. Just Enfield minutia.

But methinks that Enfield had some of the best engineers and designers of the time. The more I delve into what sometimes seems insignificant details, I recognise and appreciate some very clever work. The evolution of all things mechanical, materials and manufacturing processes of that time I find fascinating.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[RobD]

It may have been a question of fashion / style rather than harmonics? When the SMLE designers were chewing their pencils they had the new K98 and the even newer 1903 Springfield to admire. Both have barrels of 24 ins... strangely I can't hit a barn door with a K98 [can anyone?] but I find the Springfield is very accurate.

[Surpmil]

Ya, some coincidences with the barrels.

The cavalry carbine was a lightened arm for the horse soldier. The lightweight barrel was slender but fully protected by stock, hand guard and nose cap. Introduced 1894.

Introduced nine years later in 1903, the muzzle diameter on the Sht.LE is much the same as the slender carbine barrel. Take a carbine barrel and stretch it by 4-1/2 inches and you have an SMLE barrel. Coincidentally also protected by a stock, hand guard and nose cap.

Then the black magic with the barrel harmonics to get the Sht.LE to shoot and compensate. Spring loaded inner center band, then a spring loaded centering shoe in the nose cap. The long Lee had none of that, just a heavy stiff barrel.

The heavy barrel created for competition use with the SMLE is basically a long Lee barrel shortened. Which coincidentally would be the same as the No.4 barrel. Eeek! Coincidentally, the barrel diameters and taper on the No.4 rifle is pretty much the same as that of a cut down long Lee.

What does all this mean? I have no idea. Just Enfield minutia.

But methinks that Enfield had some of the best engineers and designers of the time. The more I delve into what sometimes seems insignificant details, I recognize and appreciate some very clever work. The evolution of all things mechanical, materials and manufacturing processes of that time I find fascinating.

For those who haven't heard, it is reported on another forum that member "englishman_ca" passed away earlier this year. A very sad loss indeed.

The above appears to be his last post here. R.I.P.

[browningautorifle]

it is reported on another forum that member "englishman.ca" passed away earlier this year

Sad, thanks for telling us. Should be in the memorial section...?