1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Accuracy

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Havenot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last On
    01-15-2022 @ 02:44 PM
    Location
    Oklahoma USA
    Posts
    109
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Not sure about Lithgowicon No.I rifles however when I got my SSA No.I it's accuracy wasn't quite what I thought it should be....close but rather random groups. My jungle carbine was better and so was my No.4 Mk.I rifle.

    I investigated the deal a bit and found that all the parts were there except the spring for the screw that holds the mid barrel band...it was gone. I found a similar looking coil spring and cut it to length and tightened it down. Then it shot just as accurate as the others or better....and this with damaged draws(which I fixed later)

    There are a lot of parts screws and springs involved in the No.I Mk.III* forearm/barrel fit. I noted the old SSA still appears to wear it's original forearm(worn walnut) and nosecap while the rest is replacement beech. I sort of figured Commonwealth armorers perhaps tried to keep the original front wood and parts together to maintain accuracy and sight regulation?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Mt203's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Last On
    07-30-2024 @ 05:09 PM
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    32
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Havenot View Post
    Not sure about Lithgowicon No.I rifles however when I got my SSA No.I it's accuracy wasn't quite what I thought it should be....close but rather random groups. My jungle carbine was better and so was my No.4 Mk.I rifle.

    I investigated the deal a bit and found that all the parts were there except the spring for the screw that holds the mid barrel band...it was gone. I found a similar looking coil spring and cut it to length and tightened it down. Then it shot just as accurate as the others or better....and this with damaged draws(which I fixed later)

    There are a lot of parts screws and springs involved in the No.I Mk.III* forearm/barrel fit. I noted the old SSA still appears to wear it's original forearm(worn walnut) and nosecap while the rest is replacement beech. I sort of figured Commonwealth armorers perhaps tried to keep the original front wood and parts together to maintain accuracy and sight regulation?
    Havenot; not sure if it was your suggestion, but I took my middle band spring out, opened it up slightly. I also took a little bit off the top handguard ears as they were touching very slightly. Well went to the range this morning and 5 shots is all 1.5" or less with a circular pattern vs the previous pattern.

    Only other things I did since the last range trip was another coat of RLO and cleaned the barrel

  3. #3
    Legacy Member Havenot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last On
    01-15-2022 @ 02:44 PM
    Location
    Oklahoma USA
    Posts
    109
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Does it have the tension spring and plunger under the nose-cap?

    The barrel band spring tension deal on mine was odd....shot so-so with no spring(as received)...I made a new spring and shot it some more playing with the spring tension on the middle barrel band....more so-so to fair accuracy. Took the screw to tight as it would go and she shot pretty decent then.

    I will say that this was years ago and I did not understand the LE draws and stock fit all that well. My rifles draws were hammered loose and I did not really figure that out until later. I repaired the SSA rifle's draws a couple years ago and it still prefers the barrel band snugged tight.

    I'm just saying that the SMLE rifle has a lot of parts in play just in the forearm!

  4. #4
    Legacy Member Mt203's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Last On
    07-30-2024 @ 05:09 PM
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    32
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Havenot View Post
    Does it have the tension spring and plunger under the nose-cap?

    The barrel band spring tension deal on mine was odd....shot so-so with no spring(as received)...I made a new spring and shot it some more playing with the spring tension on the middle barrel band....more so-so to fair accuracy. Took the screw to tight as it would go and she shot pretty decent then.

    I will say that this was years ago and I did not understand the LE draws and stock fit all that well. My rifles draws were hammered loose and I did not really figure that out until later. I repaired the SSA rifle's draws a couple years ago and it still prefers the barrel band snugged tight.

    I'm just saying that the SMLE rifle has a lot of parts in play just in the forearm!
    It does have the tension spring and plunger. Draws are good as this was an unissued Slazenger forend with copper lugs. I'm guessing it was a combination of the middle band tension and top handguard ears touching slightly.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. SKS and accuracy
    By enfield303t in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-23-2017, 04:56 PM
  2. No. 5 Accuracy
    By Ridolpho in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 01-31-2016, 09:55 PM
  3. Getting the most accuracy from a No. 4 MK1*
    By sigman2 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-25-2014, 04:02 AM
  4. 2a accuracy
    By simo99 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-05-2013, 05:35 AM
  5. P14 Accuracy Problems
    By Anaxes in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-29-2012, 05:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts