1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 41
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #21
    Legacy Member jesse_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last On
    09-23-2024 @ 06:20 PM
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    81
    Local Date
    07-04-2025
    Local Time
    03:17 AM
    Thread Starter
    I've messed with some horrible M1917 stocks that were produced during WW2 (the ones marked with a number where the WW1 E, R, or W would have been). In-letting way off, ect. Those were on actual rifles.

    There is a comment in the Army authorized history about accepting something like 10k M1917 barrels that didn't quite meet specs. As the war was essentially over and the rifles would probably never be used in service they were accepted.

    I wonder if that happened with stocks at the end? 3.8 million M1s produced, and an insane amount of 1903/03A3s as well, *plus* the war coming to a conclusion. The need for additional replacement 1903 stocks?

    I need to read up on contracts at the wars end, although I have read that we didn't want a repeat of what happened to Winchester at the end of WW1. In some areas of California ordinances were passed that required hardwood flooring of 3/4" thickness to keep wood usage up.

    Would not surprise me if some of these contractors shipped out of spec products with the belief that they would be surplussed out in the near future and none would be the wiser.

  2. Thank You to jesse_ For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. New to me Original No4 MK1 (Early BSA???)
    By steveTA1983 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-02-2018, 09:40 PM
  2. Arisaka Stock Color Question
    By MilsurpMM in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 02-01-2016, 09:42 AM
  3. Early small ring Broomhandle with matching original shoulder stock
    By boltaction in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-13-2012, 09:41 PM
  4. A real original early WW2 M1A1
    By Garandrew in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-07-2010, 04:47 PM
  5. Redish Color of Stock
    By reed12b in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-23-2010, 07:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts