1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:47 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    778
    Local Date
    06-15-2025
    Local Time
    06:25 AM
    Its very likely there will be an overlap of serial numbers MkIII vs MkIII* as they would not have been assembled in a single file production line.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Contributing Member desperatedan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 05:09 AM
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    334
    Real Name
    Kev D.
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    07:25 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by 5thBatt View Post
    Its very likely there will be an overlap of serial numbers MkIII vs MkIII* as they would not have been assembled in a single file production line.
    Thanks, yes that's what I suspected too but in trying to reconcile numbers it's often been stated that LSA made 50,000 MkIII*s, all in 1918 and Skennertonicon states that LSA total production in 1918 was 89,990.

    This implies that almost 40,000 MkIII rifles would have been made in 1918, and even allowing for overlap with III* production and mine being near the end of the "O' serials - 99999 being the max - most of these 1918 IIIs should therefore have been 'P' prefix.

    However I've not yet come across a 'P' serialled MkIII, only III*s with that prefix. Does this mean that LSA made more than 50,000 MkIII*s, is the 89,990 total wrong or if not why have so relatively few 1918 rifles of either Mk turned up?

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Just got my MkIII Compass back from Trademark London
    By Claven2 in forum Vintage Military Gear
    Replies: 157
    Last Post: 10-29-2021, 12:02 AM
  2. London Small Arms Co Ltd on Facebook
    By RoyalTW in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-15-2013, 04:54 AM
  3. Just got my MkIII Compass back from Trademark London
    By Claven2 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 06-12-2011, 01:35 AM
  4. What is the difference between a MkIII* and a MkIII?
    By EnfieldNutt84 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-11-2010, 11:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts