1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 80
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member mrclark303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    07-03-2025 @ 10:07 AM
    Location
    The wild west of England
    Posts
    3,442
    Real Name
    Mr Clark
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Surpmil View Post
    Begs the question: how deeply recessed is the objective lens? Would a shade be necessary? I'm guessing it would.

    Something similar a little larger would probably have made a good replacement for the No32.

    In "Without Warning" pps. 65-71 the trials are detailed which led to the adoption of the E. Leitz Canadaicon "Sniper Scope C1" in 1959. One of the sights included in the trial was a "UKicon 3x Type 1956"; anyone know what those were?

    By way or comparison the Sovieticon PSO-1 came out in the early 1960s with a range-finding illuminated reticule, IR detector and zero-retaining quick release mounts.
    The UK 3x was this scope, in an earlier version.

    It's actually a very nice scope, lovely clear optics, good positive click adjustment and they fall very naturally to the hand, so you can zero without breaking your aim.

    Had it been boosted to X4 with a slightly larger field of view, it would have made a good No32 replacement...

    That said, when the decision was made to go with the L42, why fix what isn't broken?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by mrclark303; 03-25-2023 at 08:32 PM.
    .303, helping Englishmen express their feelings since 1889

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Does anyone have a photo of a Armalite AR-5 Combo Rifle?
    By avroe in forum Other U.S. Service Rifles
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-12-2014, 08:39 AM
  2. Combo Tool Case Extractor?
    By daboone in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-07-2011, 08:35 PM
  3. Interesting JC with a scope
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-11-2011, 04:07 PM
  4. M1903 Combo Tool
    By Donzi in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-03-2009, 05:04 PM
  5. Garand Picture of the day - rare combo
    By Mark in Rochester in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Picture of the Day Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 06:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts