The No.32 Mk3 was an antique by 1970, albeit a strong and reliable one. A lighter, brighter and higher powered or even variable(!) scope would have been more effective and also reduced or eliminated the failure of the pads due to the excessive recoil forces of the No.32.
But if they couldn't be bothered to replace the butts with something more user-friendly, they certainly weren't going to bother with a new scope.
No, it's the lens hoods that cause the confusion. The long hood is apparently slotted to fit over the front of the mounts, and this illustration shows the short hood for the ocular lens which was missing from the previous image(s).
The arrow indicates where I believe we can just make out the edge of the bead on the opposite side of the slot.
The long hood shown above fitted to the ocular end is clearly not the same type: no bead and no slot, so either a service replacment of the short hood or a civilian addition.