+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: 1942 Fazakerley No4 Mk1. Really nice rifle

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

martin08 1942 Fazakerley No4 Mk1. ... 07-26-2023, 03:37 PM
Alan de Enfield Well, it has a non standard... 07-26-2023, 05:52 PM
Roger Payne It's a nice tidy rifle from... 07-26-2023, 06:09 PM
martin08 I'll try to get the internal... 07-26-2023, 06:25 PM
martin08 The only 'import' mark is a... 07-26-2023, 06:13 PM
browningautorifle It can't be original... 07-26-2023, 08:55 PM
martin08 Yes. Now I am researching... 07-26-2023, 09:11 PM
martin08 Here's a better angle of the... 07-26-2023, 07:27 PM
Bindi2 The rear sight is still in... 07-26-2023, 11:20 PM
martin08 Yes. Rear sight is... 07-27-2023, 07:31 AM
Bindi2 Replacement parts not done by... 07-27-2023, 08:05 AM
martin08 Yet, here they appear on a... 07-27-2023, 08:36 AM
Roger Payne Yes, or maybe a rather pale... 07-27-2023, 08:52 AM
martin08 Good eye. The rear sight... 07-27-2023, 09:05 AM
mrclark303 Just a general observation... 07-27-2023, 10:41 AM
martin08 The pre-'68 import mark... 07-27-2023, 11:08 AM
husk OP’s rifle looks to me like... 07-27-2023, 12:02 PM
martin08 I'll take a closer look for... 07-27-2023, 12:48 PM
Brian Dick I think it's honest. My guess... 07-27-2023, 02:37 PM
Daan Kemp When sold they were just... 07-27-2023, 11:28 PM
martin08 If there are any particular... 07-28-2023, 10:46 AM
martin08 Thank you, Brian. I looked... 07-27-2023, 03:05 PM
Brian Dick Here's what it is: "IAC ALEX... 07-27-2023, 04:38 PM
martin08 Under the handguards, it... 07-28-2023, 02:09 PM
Brian Dick It's exactly as it should be.... 07-28-2023, 02:16 PM
martin08 Indeed, this is a very nice... 07-28-2023, 03:26 PM
Surpmil It's a roughly-made 1942... 08-07-2023, 10:26 AM
browningautorifle It would look like that. 08-07-2023, 10:32 AM
Surpmil I've seen the photos as well... 08-07-2023, 10:36 AM
browningautorifle Interesting... 08-07-2023, 03:34 PM
martin08 I am just so glad that I quit... 08-07-2023, 07:36 PM
Surpmil Personally I never started,... 08-07-2023, 08:56 PM
martin08 I most certainly asked for... 08-08-2023, 06:03 PM
Brian Dick Rob, The phosphate of the... 08-09-2023, 08:47 AM
Surpmil I wouldn't see us disagreeing... 08-09-2023, 09:14 PM
Brian Dick My word is not gospel. I'm... 08-10-2023, 10:22 AM
Surpmil Interesting Brian! My... 08-13-2023, 03:07 PM
martin08 Would there be other evidence... 07-27-2023, 01:08 PM
Brian Dick I forgot to add that I have... 07-27-2023, 02:48 PM
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:58 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,546
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    06-11-2025
    Local Time
    02:39 AM
    It's a nice tidy rifle from what I can see. The A suffix rifles are not uncommon, & although it meant that that they might be difficult when it came to repairs, it did not mean that they were unsafe to fire. I do not believe that it came out of ROFF looking like that. Firstly, it appears to have been black painted (quite probably suncorite) which was not in use in 1942. The original finish is more likely to have been oil blacked or blued early in the war. On top of this the charger bridge insert has been welded over. This occurred very commonly with repairs & refurbishment, as the little insert commonly worked loose, & 'slipping a gob of weld' on it was a sure fix.

    I'm also not sure why the rifle serial has been stamped into the butt in the same place that scope numbers were stamped on No 4 T's......I don't think there was ever a requirement for it in UKicon service, although no doubt someone will correct me on this if I have it wrong.

    But it's a nice looking rifle regardless.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 07-27-2023 at 08:46 AM. Reason: clarification

  2. Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    martin08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Last On
    05-18-2025 @ 06:48 PM
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    329
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:39 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    It's a nice tidy rifle from what I can see. The A suffix rifles are not uncommon, & although it meant that that they might be difficult when it came to repairs, it did not mean that they were unsafe to fire. I do not believe that it came out of ROFF looking like that. Firstly, it appears to have been black painted (quite probably suncorite) which was not in use in 1942. The original finish is more likely to have been oil blacked early in the war. On top of this the charger bridge insert has been welded over. This occurred very commonly with repairs & refurbishment, as the little insert commonly worked loose, & 'slipping a gob of weld' on it was a sure fix.

    I'm also not sure why the rifle serial has been stamped into the butt in the same place that scope numbers were stamped on No 4 T's......I don't think there was ever a requirement for it in UKicon service, although no doubt someone will correct me on this if I have it wrong.

    But it's a nice looking rifle regardless.
    I'll try to get the internal receiver pictures soon. It looks like a gun which was never refinished.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Still wrapped 1955 No.4 Mk2 Enfield Rifle (Mfg by Fazakerley)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-20-2012, 02:36 PM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-09-2010, 10:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...