Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Swedish Mauser book

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    FSR17601's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Last On
    08-20-2024 @ 05:37 PM
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    10:42 AM
    Those using that book should be aware that while it has plenty of useful info, it also has a reputation for containing multiple errors. So best not to treat it as definitive or a slam-dunk resource - it is one data point for discovery and discussion.

    Since I know I am going to be asked for examples, I will mention what I discovered when researching the M94, since I was in the market for one. Page 10 states that carbine production began at Carl Gustaf in 1896, but it is well accepted that production of the carbine in Sweden did not start until 1898. Then on page 6, we read that "Production (of Swedishicon Mausers) began in 1894 with 52 prototype carbines and continued uninterrupted at Carl Gustaf from 1898 to 1925 ... ." While the Receiver Production Table on the facing page shows M94 carbine receiver production occurring at CG beginning in 1901. That table is reproduced later in the book, where we read that "the lowest C-G manufactured m/94 carbine serial number observed by the authors was 40,070, dated 1900." And then, "Our study of Swedish carbine serial number have (sic) led us to the following tentative conclusions: ...3) A total of 115,000 m/94 series carbines were manufactured at CG. They fall into two groups of serial numbers: A) circa 10,000 to 54,000 manufactured between 1901 and 1907." This is contradicted by their own statement on p. 10 and by their stated observation of a 1900 dated m/94. This is all very muddled at best. And confusing for someone contemplating purchasing an M94 with an 1898-dated receiver. I'm quoting from the 3rd edition of the book from 2011, by the way, whereas the far superior book "Crown Jewels" was first published in 2006. The 3rd edition is labeled "revised," so there is really no excuse for ignoring the other publication to the extent that appears to be the case. I can't speak to other errors in the book, but my online research assures me they are in there.
    Last edited by FSR17601; 09-24-2023 at 01:37 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-18-2022, 04:08 PM
  2. Swedish Mauser M96
    By Light Infantry in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-27-2019, 10:07 AM
  3. New M38 Swedish Mauser.
    By Calfed in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-01-2013, 12:16 AM
  4. M38 Swedish Mauser
    By xa-coupe in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-15-2011, 03:50 AM
  5. 1896 Swedish Mauser 6.5x55mm (Mfg by Mauser Werk Oberndorf) (CGN Private Ad)
    By Badger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2007, 07:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts