1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 32
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:47 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,672
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    02:52 PM
    The seller has misunderstood something I fear.............

    The L12 designation was the designation of the sub calibre KIT and not the rifle. There was NEVER a designation of RIFLE, .22" L12. THAT L12 rifle designation WAS THE PRESERVE OF A SPECIALLY ADAPTED SHOTGUN. And what I see doesn't look much like a specially adapted shotgun..........! The L12 kit was KIT, conversion 0.22" calibre, L12A1 for 7.62mm rifle..

    That is only my view based on nothing more than my bit-part experience, the EMER, the parts list and the L12 user handbook.

    We did have rifles with the kit permanently fitted, caused by the .22" barrel bulging and jamming solid in the 7.62 bore. These were still on charge as a rifle but relegated to indoor training (or out door poaching on the training areas.....) but with a red band around the handguards and all unnecessary parts, such as gas parts and return springs stripped from them. When this occurred, the now .22" rifle was retained IF THE REQUIREMENT EXISTS and a new rifle issued as a replacement. Alas, when the L1A1's were called in for replacement by the L85, these .22" rifles seemed to languish in the backs of armouries or Armourers shops until someone decided what to do with them.

  2. The Following 7 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. no4 t Singapore colonial/national police
    By paul87buick in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-05-2017, 05:28 AM
  2. Enterprise/Lithgow L1A1
    By Anzac15 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-28-2017, 02:51 PM
  3. My new Lithgow, New Zealand contract L1A1
    By mrclark303 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-08-2015, 02:51 AM
  4. Lithgow L1A1
    By mrclark303 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 04-23-2013, 03:06 AM
  5. Value of Lithgow L1A1 skeleton
    By Rusty.303 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-11-2012, 11:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts