1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 11
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:37 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,747
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    08:47 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by jonh172 View Post
    Hi all!

    I am curious about the lineage of this rifle.
    I looked up serial numbers and couldn’t find any mk1*’s with serial 0C0###. Is this an odd one? Or not that rate.

    Thanks in advance!

    Jon

    Pictures here.

    Imgur: The magic of the Internet

    That certainly appears to be an oddity, normally you won't find any Mk1* in the low serial numbers because the 1st (approximatley) 120,000 rifle Savage produced were No4 Mk1 (without the alteration to the bolt release system) Savage wanted to simplify the manufacture so applied for a derogation to allow them to deviate from the specification.
    Despite the fact that this change could result in rifles getting damaged and not loading correctly the permission was granted. Britainicon never changed over to this 'lower standard' and we kept our manufacturers supplying to the specifications.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Alan de Enfield; 03-07-2024 at 04:13 AM.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  2. #2
    Legacy Member jonh172's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    04-07-2025 @ 09:41 AM
    Posts
    411
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    02:47 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan de Enfield View Post
    That certainly appears to be an oddity, normally you won't find any Mk1* in the low serial numbers because the 1st (approximatley) 120,000 rifle Savage produced were No4 Mk1 (without the alteration to the bolt release system) Savage wanted to simplify the manufacture so applied for a derogation to allow them to deviate from the specification.
    Despite the fact that this change could result in rifles getting damaged and not loading correctly the permission was granted. Britainicon never changed over to this 'lower standard' and we kept our manufacturers supplying to the specifications.
    Thanks Alan!

    From what little research I did I could not seem to find any logs of Mk1* with 0 after the C, they seemed to all have a number other than 0 so I found this one odd.

    I’m wondering if it’s worth restoring??

    ---------- Post added at 09:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:41 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    My memory is dim, but this rifle has five digits after the C which suggests to me that it isn't an early rifle at all, but a late one. I'm no expert on Savage serials but wasn't it the case that towards the end of production (when they got to a million???) they started again at 0C but with an extra digit to the right of the C in the serial number.............?
    I think you are correct Roger in that it is a late war produced mk1* and they started over at 0C but the 0 after the C is what’s puzzling.
    I may be way off here and it’s perfectly normal, but I couldn’t seem to find any proof the numbers after the C started at 0.
    Please let me know your thoughts on this!

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 1942 SAVAGE No4MK1 T....w/telescope
    By bros in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-09-2018, 03:24 AM
  2. New Savage No4Mk1
    By tbonesmith in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-06-2016, 01:09 PM
  3. No serial number on Savage No4Mk1*?
    By Six Star in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-07-2012, 08:31 AM
  4. odd savage no4mk1*
    By yoyo2123 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-23-2011, 05:06 AM
  5. Savage No4Mk1*(T) Questions
    By gsthreeeight in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 05-31-2011, 09:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts