1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 11
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 12:54 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,713
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    05:59 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by JustAMarine View Post
    Totally get what you are saying about the precision rifle.
    Before supply every rifle (even those 'in the wrap') were test fired and had to meet the standards.
    The accuracy specification for the No4 rifle was :

    SMLE TESTING
    For the SMLE All rifles were tested for accuracy by the Small Arms Inspection Department at 100ft, and 10% were also tested at 600 yds. All rifles were fired from a special mechanical rest, known as an Enfield Rest, and a special Telescope layer was used for laying an aim. The Enfield Rest was designed to simulate the conditions under which a rifle would be held when fired from the shoulder, and was provided with hand wheel adjustments for laying an aim. Trial shots were first fired and, if necessary the foresight was adjusted laterally, or replaced by one of a different height, until the shots on the target were within the required limits. Five rounds were then fired, and four of the five shots had to be contained in a rectangle 1 inch broad by 1½ in high. Rifle which failed this test were rejected. At 600 yds 10 shots were fired, nine of which had to fall within a 2 foot circle.

    No 4 RIFLE TESTING
    For the No 4 Rifle, the accuracy test was the same at 100ft ten per cent of all rifles were then fired at 200 yds when six of seven shots had to fall in a rectangle 6in x 6in , the point of mean impact having to be within 3 inches of the point of aim in any direction. Ten per cent of rifles fired at 200 yds were again fired at 600 yds when 6 out of seven shots had to be in a rectangle 18 inches x 18 inches the permissible deviation of point of mean impact being 9 inches up or down, or left or right. Two per cent of rifles were fired from the shoulder, ten rounds being fed into the magazine by charger and fired rapid to test “feeding up” and ejection. After these tests the barrel was inspected to ensure that there was no expansion in the bore or chamber and that it shaded correctly from end to end. (Was not bent)

    No 5 TESTING
    The firing test to which the No 5 rifle was subjected was the same as that for the No 4 at 100ft. It was not tested at 200 yds but 10 per cent were tested at 600 yards when the acceptance was ten out of ten shots contained in a rectangle 36 inches x 36 inches. Two per cent of the No 5 rifles were also submitted to the same functioning test as the No4 rifle.
    Throughout World War 2 much of the accuracy testing was done by women shooters who quickly became proficient at the job. To speed up the procedure, the telescope layer was dispensed with, and aim was taken in the normal way through the back sight. The .1 inch aperture in the back sight was too large for easily laying a correct aim at 100ft, and a small spring steel adaptor was used.



    Despite being manufactured to be 'minute of man' I have a Savage produced Mk1* that holds just under 1 MoA when I play my part.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Lee Enfield No4 Mk2 still in the mummy wrap...
    By amadeus76 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-17-2018, 02:29 AM
  2. New low numbered RIA!
    By Rick the Librarian in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-18-2013, 08:16 PM
  3. Pics of 'mummy wrapped' last ditch Arisaka.
    By Anzac15 in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 10-16-2012, 04:08 PM
  4. Mummy wrapped 'last ditch' Arisaka and bolt.
    By Anzac15 in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-21-2012, 05:08 PM
  5. Mummy No 4 Mk 2
    By B & B ARSENAL in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-17-2010, 12:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts