+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: No. 4 Rifle; Zeroing Instructions Data Inconsistency?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Posts
    95
    Local Date
    07-02-2025
    Local Time
    12:19 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan de Enfield View Post
    MkVI vs MKVII is another subject :
    comparison in trajectories of MkVI & MkVII
    Alan, that off-topic subject is dangerously close to sending me down yet another military pam rabbit hole unrelated to conflicting zeroing instructions.

    So if the potential enemy infantry of 1929 was apparently 5'3" in height... what are they today, almost a century later?

    And if that potential enemy were seated on horseback as calvary, now the top of their heads are only 39" higher? How many hands height were cavalry horses back then? Short legged little compact ponies? Seems a fair question because I never rode a horse back when I was growing up on our place where the stirrups were either even with the top of the horse's femur or the same height as my instep at the crotch.

    And then there's the difference infantry company/platoon/section commanders would consider between the two regarding beaten zones and first catch/first graze.[quote=Alan de Enfield;547175]No, I don't think so - In the past I have read reports of SMLE sidewalls fracturing.

    ---------- Post added at 03:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:32 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan de Enfield View Post
    No, I don't think so - In the past I have read reports of SMLE sidewalls fracturing.

    I think the examples of fractured bolts has generally been found to be poorly cast (granulated) steel in the bolt body.
    Alan; fun personal trivia... when a friend bought the remnants of the failed Montana Rifle Company, compete with both modern Haas five axis CNC machinery and surplus Springfield Armory WWI Pratt and Whitney gun drills and reamers, I worked for him for a few months as the ops manager to sort through the chaos and get some simple manufacturing and cash flow going.

    While sorting through the carcass for any and all useful information, I went through the Customer Service files. In some of those complaint letters from purchasing of Montana Rifle Company's reworking of the classic Model 70 action, were letters relating to cracked receivers and bolt lugs. Those receivers and bolts were made on very, very modern machinery in that facility, from modern bar stock and castings, and then test fired with proof rounds and then inspected again before shipping.

    In the case of the cracked receivers, I later found out that MRC was getting shipments of castings where some were misshapen - some to the point of almost resembling a banana. Rather than reject them and request replacements (and better QA/QC), MRC had their machinests muckle together some jigs, and then trained a couple of eager, conscientious young employees to use a hydraulic press and an array of dial indicators to bend those crooked castings enough so that they could be fitted into the tombstones of their CNC machines and then machined into a finished receiver. They then shipped them back across the country to have the heat treating and hardening redone to be as it was when the castings were received.

    You don't have to be a machinist nor a genius to realize that machining those imperfect and still crooked blanks would invariably result in thin and thick parts at various points in the finished receiver. Nor stress points induced from being reshapen in a 20 ton hydraulic press.

    BTW, they also fired their head machinist and CNC programmer (a brilliant guy they hired away from the aerospace industry) because he told them the problem with the receiver blanks was mould slump in the castings. Later on, a rep from the company that did the castings came around, looked at the castings that resembled bananas, and said it was mould slump... no wonder they went T-U when being run by that boutique consortium that purchased MRC from the original owner.

    So that's circa 2018... I can easily imagine all the various possibilities that could result in failure from poor castings a century beforehand, manufacturing under the pressure of WWI conditions.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 11:06 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,755
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    07-02-2025
    Local Time
    07:19 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    So that's circa 2018... I can easily imagine all the various possibilities that could result in failure from poor castings a century beforehand, manufacturing under the pressure of WWI conditions.
    A couple of pics of fractured No4 rifles
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Broken Lug Broken bolt.jpg‎
Views:	92
Size:	69.1 KB
ID:	139293   Click image for larger version

Name:	Broken Lug Failure.jpg‎
Views:	91
Size:	53.4 KB
ID:	139294  
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Need help zeroing a type 3 Weaver M73B1 rifle scope
    By ghost07 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-16-2023, 10:11 AM
  2. Military zeroing of the No. 4 - inconsistent data?
    By Rick in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-31-2020, 05:22 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-20-2015, 08:57 PM
  4. zeroing my 91-30: the rifle or me?
    By t-train in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-22-2014, 04:29 PM
  5. LEE rifle sizing die instructions
    By concretus in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-16-2009, 04:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts