I'm begining to wonder why there almost no interest in the mechanical proprties and metalurgy of the
Enfield Rifles
among Collectors of the Enfield Rifles.
Seems like collectors of other firearms go to great lengths to learn as much as possible about how the guns were made, and steps taken to overcome early difficulties with the design.
Since the Lee Enfields were for the most part manufactured using Pratt and Whitney Gauges and Mass Production techniques developed by Colt and other US Gunmakers, and the Basic action design was a development of a design by a US Citizen who's bolt action rifles were in use by the US military long before the
British
ever tested it, its likely that technical knowledge of the rifles can be found among the records of US manufacturers such as Pratt & Whitney or Savage about as easily as the strangely sparse published data from UK sources.
Surely a few UK members have books on the subject with information that would be useful.
The Metalurgy of the M1917 was easy to find, most likely because the US Military always kept detailed records on such things, and made them available for study by prospective manufacturers and designers of the future.
So far I've found little in UK sources on metalurgy and next to none on manufacturing techniques employed.