+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: (T) ?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

Pete04 (T) ? 06-25-2007, 07:57 AM
Badger It's a good question....... 06-25-2007, 08:04 AM
stencollector Yes they could. Especially... 06-25-2007, 08:51 AM
Claven2 I disagree! For example: ... 06-25-2007, 09:15 AM
stencollector I would be careful on that... 06-25-2007, 12:39 PM
Claven2 I dunno - I've seen 1941... 06-25-2007, 01:19 PM
Lee Enfield Rather obviously the answer... 06-25-2007, 01:49 PM
Badger Great thread.... :thup: ... 06-25-2007, 02:02 PM
Warren Did you check the mount to... 06-25-2007, 05:02 PM
303sniper Hi All, In the book The... 06-26-2007, 10:54 AM
stencollector The staking of the screws was... 06-26-2007, 06:22 PM
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel stencollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-08-2025 @ 12:42 PM
    Location
    Shilo MB
    Posts
    796
    Local Date
    09-07-2025
    Local Time
    12:37 AM
    Yes they could. Especially some of the Cdn ones, where the instruction to stamp the T was after the rifles had already headed to the units. As such, if they ever even got the T mark, it may not even be the proper droopy ear T anyway.

    Also, there were many TR marked (but no T) rifles which were in stores less their telescopes. Eventually some of these would have gone into service, and mated to a scope/bracket combination, with the scope number getting stamped onto the butt, and eventually the rifle number getting stamped onto the bracket (post war, I believe).

    As to the rest of the stamps, yes they should be there, but with Enfields you can never say always, and never say never.

    I had one of the troop trials no4mk1 rifles which had been converted to Sniper....there was no T on the sidewall of that gun.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Senior Moderator
    (Founding Partner)


    Site Founder
    Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    09-05-2025 @ 11:44 PM
    Location
    Scandaltown, Ontario
    Posts
    3,346
    Real Name
    Ronald
    Local Date
    09-07-2025
    Local Time
    01:37 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by stencollector View Post
    but with Enfields you can never say always, and never say never.
    I disagree! For example:

    -Lee Enfields ALWAYS had receivers made of steel.
    -Lee Enfields made at longbranch ALWAYS were of the No.4Mk1* pattern from 1942 onwards.
    -Lee Enfields made in Australiaicon after 1940 ALWAYS had Coachwood stocks with threaded brass re-inforcing pins
    -Longbranch NEVER manufactured the No.1MkIII.

    See? Easy!
    Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...