1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Type 2 NM WRA!

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #3
    Deceased May 2nd, 2020 Cosine26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-18-2020 @ 07:29 PM
    Location
    Cal
    Posts
    506
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    06:00 PM

    Rhetorical NM M1 Question

    Rhetorical Question
    I have a rhetorical question for the M1 Experts. The question concerns a “Winchester Type 2 National Match M1”
    I am not a collector but my definition of a National Match rifle (be it a M1903, an M1 or an M14icon) is a match rifle built at the Springfield Armory by SA technicians to the specification in effect at the time the rifle was built. All others while they may be MATCH rifles are not National Match. This is not to impugn the accuracy of rifles built by armorers other than SA. I have a Match M1 built by an army armorer on a Winchester receiver using all NM parts that will shoot with any NM M1, but it is not a National Match by my definition.
    It is my understanding that the first 800 NM M1’s were rifles taken from the assembly line at SA which when targeted showed exceptional accuracy. These were reworked and issued as NM M1’s. In subsequent years NM M1’s were either new M1’s taken from the SA production line or rebuilt M1’s from previous years which were turned in by service teams until 1960. After 1960 the M1 was no longer in production so that all 1960 and later NM M1’s were rebuilds. It would seem to me that all true NM M1’s (according to my definition above) would have SA receivers.
    For many years from 1959 through 1969, the heyday of the M1 as a NM rifle, I lived within 20 miles of two Army posts, shot with and against the post teams, and knew the post rifle team members and armorers very well. Each year these teams when traveling to the National Matches at Camp Perry would turn in last year’s rifles and draw a new issue of the current NM M1’s. The “turn ins” would be rebuilt for reissue next year. I suppose that some of the receivers would be found to be “unserviceable” and would be replaced with receivers drawn from stock. I suppose that it is possible that at this time a receiver manufactured by a manufacturer other the SA could be introduced into the system but I should think that the SA would maintain a stock of receivers for replacement purposes. I would wonder if the artisans as SA would consider a Winchester receiver with its rough machining would be considered adequate for use in building a NM M1?
    Just a rhetorical question for the experts.
    Last edited by Cosine26; 07-24-2009 at 12:10 PM. Reason: omitted word

Similar Threads

  1. type 99 lmg value?
    By popup in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-01-2009, 11:16 PM
  2. Type 38
    By Johnny Peppers in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-05-2009, 04:55 PM
  3. Type II Lock Bar Nut
    By MontaukTrl in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-26-2009, 11:14 PM
  4. Any one loading for Jap Type 99????
    By heckinohio in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-29-2009, 02:47 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts