I believe what was asked concerned the wisdom of letting groups go through cases of rifles and select ones for purchase. That smacks of favoritism and that is the one thing that no organization open to the public wants to stand accused of.
I think Orest Michaels is an outstanding administrator of the CMP, but such a convention perhaps never should have been held. The "cherrypicking" that was so rampant some years back is well known. I have talked with some folks there at the time and I saw the cherrypicking wars on the old Jouster
forum. Those were brutal and long lasting affairs. People are now bitter enemies as a result and much of the information needed by the less experienced collectors was never discussed as informed posters left the site rather than be accused of various misdeeds. There was even a time when some posters attempted to only discuss collector information by PM's so the general public couldn't access the details of fakes, markings and details. Duff's informational texts help immensely, but there is new information almost daily. Still, there are some who want to keep these new bits to themselves. You can see this if you look around.
The only real way to have this convention is to restrict the sale of these rifles and that's exactly what the CMP doesn't want to do. These rifles need to be moved along into private hands, but some perceptions will be the result of having a convention that allows some to have access while denying it to others.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.