+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: I'm confused - 1905 & 1906 Bayonets..??

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Moderator
    (Deceased Nov 16th, 2019)

    JimF4M1s (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-01-2025 @ 05:49 PM
    Location
    USA
    Age
    76
    Posts
    3,439
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    12:33 AM
    Mike,

    I have all the M.H. Cole books and the "Best Of" re-edited by Mike Silvey

    Here is what I found in Cole's book #3, hope it helps.

    Jim



    BAYONET MODEL 1905

    The M. 1905 bayonet has a 16" blade and walnut handles. It fits the M-1903 Springfield and M1icon garand rifles. These bayonets will be found dated 1906 through 1922. the early dates from 1906 up to 1917 had a bright polished blade. With the hilt and guard and about 3/16" of the blade blued. Starting with the 1917 date all of the metal was parkerized through the 1922 date. On occasion some of the early dates will be found with a blue or parkerized finish. These are thought to have been arsenal refinished. Stamped on the reverse S.A./bomb/and date on the obverse is stamped U.S. over a serial number. This same bayonet was made at Rock Island Arsenal and stamped R.I.A./over bomb/& date.

    It shows sketches also of the scabbards.
    Type #1 had a short metal throat on leather body stamped R.I.A./1906 J.N.S.

    Type #2 had a long metal throat on leather body stamped R.I.A. /1907 H.E.K.

    Model 1905 modified Scabbard stamped R.I.A./1907 F.P.B.

    Model 1910 Scabbard marked BoyT it had a canvas body with a leather tip.

    Model 1910 Scabbard type No. 2 scabbard shows a deeper throat into the canvas body.

    BAYONET MODEL 1942

    Bayonet model 1942 was essentially the same bayonet as the M-1905. The main difference being a change from wooden to plastic grips which were usually black. But some are redish brown color. These bayonets were not made at the U.S. arsenals but by different contractors and were certainly not as well made and finished as the previous arsenal made bayonets. They were stamped with the makers name or mark, over an ordnace bomb, U.S. over the date of manufacture such as 1942-1943. The M3 scabbard made of olive green plastic was issued with bayonet.

    Sketches show different makers markings, OL, U.F.H., PAL, WT, AFH, UC.

    Later it talks about the:

    Bayonet M.1905E1 which were modified 1905 & 1942 bayonets.

    In late 1942 it was decided to cut 6" from the existing bayonets thus making a 10" blade. Some were ground to a Spear point and some to a Bowie type point
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mike Haas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-23-2019 @ 05:54 PM
    Posts
    509
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    03:33 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by JimF4M1sicon View Post
    Mike,

    I have all the M.H. Cole books and the "Best Of" re-edited by Mike Silvey

    Here is what I found in Cole's book #3, hope it helps.

    Jim



    BAYONET MODEL 1905

    The M. 1905 bayonet has a 16" blade and walnut handles. It fits the M-1903 Springfield and M1icon garand rifles. These bayonets will be found dated 1906 through 1922. the early dates from 1906 up to 1917 had a bright polished blade. With the hilt and guard and about 3/16" of the blade blued. Starting with the 1917 date all of the metal was parkerized through the 1922 date. On occasion some of the early dates will be found with a blue or parkerized finish. These are thought to have been arsenal refinished. Stamped on the reverse S.A./bomb/and date on the obverse is stamped U.S. over a serial number. This same bayonet was made at Rock Island Arsenal and stamped R.I.A./over bomb/& date.

    It shows sketches also of the scabbards.
    Type #1 had a short metal throat on leather body stamped R.I.A./1906 J.N.S.

    Type #2 had a long metal throat on leather body stamped R.I.A. /1907 H.E.K.

    Model 1905 modified Scabbard stamped R.I.A./1907 F.P.B.

    Model 1910 Scabbard marked BoyT it had a canvas body with a leather tip.

    Model 1910 Scabbard type No. 2 scabbard shows a deeper throat into the canvas body.

    BAYONET MODEL 1942

    Bayonet model 1942 was essentially the same bayonet as the M-1905. The main difference being a change from wooden to plastic grips which were usually black. But some are redish brown color. These bayonets were not made at the U.S. arsenals but by different contractors and were certainly not as well made and finished as the previous arsenal made bayonets. They were stamped with the makers name or mark, over an ordnace bomb, U.S. over the date of manufacture such as 1942-1943. The M3 scabbard made of olive green plastic was issued with bayonet.

    Sketches show different makers markings, OL, U.F.H., PAL, WT, AFH, UC.

    Later it talks about the:

    Bayonet M.1905E1 which were modified 1905 & 1942 bayonets.

    In late 1942 it was decided to cut 6" from the existing bayonets thus making a 10" blade. Some were ground to a Spear point and some to a Bowie type point
    OK - If I got this right then my friends bayo is a 1905 made by SA in 1906 which is actually the 1st year of production; the serial # then would the sequential # for his bayo in 1906. His handles (scales) appear to walnut and almost worn smooth. He doesn't have a scabbard.
    My '42' UFH with M3 is now clear to me.

    browningautorifleicon - I'll post pictures on this thread late this weekend or early next week.

    Thanks for the imput!

  3. #3
    Moderator
    (Deceased Nov 16th, 2019)

    JimF4M1s (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-01-2025 @ 05:49 PM
    Location
    USA
    Age
    76
    Posts
    3,439
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    12:33 AM
    Mike,

    You mention Pal in your first post and UFH in the last one. Do you have two of these?

    Cole's book shows serial numbers in the sketches. But it doesn't say if they are highest for that year or just the example he had seen, they are sequential, guessing highest.

    S.A.
    1906-108913
    1907-202698
    1908-348064
    1909-413979
    1910-433686
    1911-489214
    1912-522358
    1913-553574
    1914-596722
    1915-610658
    1916-646865
    1917-679323
    1918-1009248
    1919-1045130
    1920-1133202
    1921-1185016
    1922-1195433

    R.I.A.
    1906-no number
    1907-102099
    1908-136401
    1909-165703
    1910-177503
    1911-193454
    1913-238285
    1917-284204
    1918-304674
    1919-404830
    Some years missing for R.I.A. it doesn't say if they were not produced those year.

  4. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    J D Shelby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    11-26-2011 @ 02:00 PM
    Posts
    4
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    02:33 AM

    S A 1910 bayonet

    Quote Originally Posted by JimF4M1sicon View Post
    Mike,

    You mention Pal in your first post and UFH in the last one. Do you have two of these?

    Cole's book shows serial numbers in the sketches. But it doesn't say if they are highest for that year or just the example he had seen, they are sequential, guessing highest.

    S.A.
    1906-108913
    1907-202698
    1908-348064
    1909-413979
    1910-433686
    1911-489214
    1912-522358
    1913-553574
    1914-596722
    1915-610658
    1916-646865
    1917-679323
    1918-1009248
    1919-1045130
    1920-1133202
    1921-1185016
    1922-1195433

    R.I.A.
    1906-no number
    1907-102099
    1908-136401
    1909-165703
    1910-177503
    1911-193454
    1913-238285
    1917-284204
    1918-304674
    1919-404830
    Some years missing for R.I.A. it doesn't say if they were not produced those year.
    I have a S.A. 1910 sn 455291 so that takes it over for the year listed above

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Confused with a question
    By Edward Horton in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-30-2009, 07:21 PM
  2. I am sure the Germans were confused!!!
    By A. F Medic in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-21-2009, 10:30 PM
  3. Confused by S'G' note in Riesch 5th ed
    By colreed in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-15-2009, 01:38 PM
  4. confused on Saginaw
    By dnikkor in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-26-2009, 07:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts