-
-
-
12-21-2019 09:17 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Contributing Member
John,
It was the 1962 Act that tried and failed to encapsulate everything, but it was in deed as you state the 1968 Act that changed things for good.
I am sure I recollect NZ had Firearms Laws modelled off the UK, as several of our officers transferred there in the 2000's and found a like minded system.
Is that not the case?
'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA
-
-
-
Contributing Member
I tend to agree with you. Depending on the next 4 to 5 years, we could see 2 new members on the Supreme Court here in the US and that will lead to a flurry of gun rights cases being reviewed. In California, the governor just signed a "precursor parts bill" requiring all gun parts have serialized numbers and be registered with the California DOJ. Of course, it doesn't go into effect until 01/01/24, which tells you he knew it was illegal when he signed it, but he can now brag that he did.
-
-
If you wish to discuss the politics of firearms ownership or the practices and policies of various governments attempting to control them, then please use the appropriate venue described in the thread titled Where can I discuss politics and gun legislation issues? (click here).
Regards,
Doug
-
Thank You to Badger For This Useful Post: