Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: A Theory offered by CINDERS

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2025 @ 11:38 PM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    8,108
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    10:22 PM

    A Theory offered by CINDERS

    For a very long time I have loaded my 303's with 174 SMK's and driven them at or near 2,440FPS which is the velocity the standard Mk VII ball round was.
    What I had noticed is that at this velocity it did not match up at all to the sight graduations on the sight ladders of either my Mk III's or No.4's.
    As you found that at times it equated to a 100 to perhaps 200yd higher setting on the ladder to get POA/POI and this had me a bit perplexed until I got a light bulb moment.

    I was consulting the latest ADI book and reading about the new propellants coming on line and how they are lowering the temp of the flame and also incorporating an additive to reduce copper fouling.
    Got to thinking about BC's and this is where I think I have erred all these years and my thoughts are thus;
    There is no comparison between the MK VII ballistics and the reloads we have due to better powders, different rates of burn as cordite burned faster & hotter the BC's of the projectiles are streets apart.
    So here is what I think if we have an SMK that flies flatter than the MK VII projie at the same velocity then it will hit LOWER on the target at a given range by that simple fact it flies flatter.
    So in order to get the POI we raise our sights because we need to be on POA/POI but it defies logic as we have a bullet flying flatter so we have to lift up the sights.

    Sooooo what I am going to play with and be a secret squirrel till I get it right is load down the rounds to minimum and go from there (NOTE: Never go under minimum load data)
    Will see what happens and I will report back and as we only go back to 600yds in our matches keeping above the tran-sonic will not be a problem.

    What do you chaps think is my summation correct it sounds bizarre I know but think about it and you will see I feel the theory has merit.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to CINDERS For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Hey Cinders, and all in Australia
    By painter777 in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-01-2017, 06:00 AM
  2. CINDERS Mid-range shell cases
    By CINDERS in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-20-2016, 06:58 AM
  3. CINDERS latest arrivals
    By CINDERS in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-16-2016, 10:55 PM
  4. M1A1 Stock Common Crack Theory
    By frankderrico in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-08-2016, 11:36 AM
  5. I have a theory and ?'s on my Model 1917 quirks.
    By sakorick in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-25-2011, 05:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts