-
Legacy Member
175 gr Nosler RDF bullets
Has anyone used these in their milsurp reloading?
I'm wondering particularly how it would work in 7.5 Swiss. It has a high BC...higher than the Berger 175 gr VLD, which is often compared favorably to the GP11 projectile.
https://www.midwayusa.com/product/10...oint-boat-tail
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
01-20-2018 09:23 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
I have tried the Berger's and they are ok.... I have my best results with smk bthp 168's With imr 4895 (44grains) worked very nicely.... submoa. I tried 175 smk's but they were not as good. Oh, and I used berdan primers. Powder valley had them on sale last year or 2 and I bought 10,000 of them 😳. Why, idk other than I knew they would be a rare finding in the future. Then at the height of my work-up, gp11 miraculously appeared on the market and I bought a lot to last for years. To answer your question, the bergers were not worth the extra bit of money. Greats results with Sierra match king
-
-
-
Contributing Member
As a side note Sierra 6.5mm 142gn Match are now $104/100 here where as the 140 VLD Bergers are $72/100 which one would you buy!
Whilst the SMK's work well so do the Berger VLD's out of my 6.5 x 284 and I sure as eggs cannot justify the extra $32 just because its name is Seirra........
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Best fortune with 168 SMK and 4064. Same load with Nosler 168 produced the same group but shot 3" lower for some reason.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I have 175 Nossler Match, but not the RLD, those were ok.
The Sierra 175 M shot better.
I would like to see a GP11 bullet profile compared to the others.
From what I can tell, it seems to be fatter not longer, LD type. Probably will pull one out so I can see it.
Maybe put it on the coppier with the Nossler and Sierra 175 and see what I get.
Last edited by RC20; 01-21-2018 at 08:19 PM.
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
maxim
Best fortune with 168 SMK and 4064. Same load with Nosler 168 produced the same group but shot 3" lower for some reason.
I've done pretty well with that combo in my 1911's...43.9 grs of 4064 and 168 gr Nosler CC's
---------- Post added at 05:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:41 PM ----------
Originally Posted by
speckles
I have tried the Berger's and they are ok.... I have my best results with smk bthp 168's With imr 4895 (44grains) worked very nicely.... submoa. I tried 175 smk's but they were not as good. Oh, and I used berdan primers. Powder valley had them on sale last year or 2 and I bought 10,000 of them 😳. Why, idk other than I knew they would be a rare finding in the future. Then at the height of my work-up, gp11 miraculously appeared on the market and I bought a lot to last for years. To answer your question, the bergers were not worth the extra bit of money. Greats results with Sierra match king
I've had good luck with 168's and 4064 in my 1911's. My K-31's seem to like 175's and Re-17 better
---------- Post added at 05:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:42 PM ----------
Originally Posted by
CINDERS
As a side note Sierra 6.5mm 142gn Match are now $104/100 here where as the 140 VLD Bergers are $72/100 which one would you buy!
Whilst the SMK's work well so do the Berger VLD's out of my 6.5 x 284 and I sure as eggs cannot justify the extra $32 just because its name is Seirra........
Damn...
-
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
RC20
I have 175 Nossler Match, but not the RLD, those were ok.
The Sierra 175 M shot better.
I would like to see a GP11 bullet profile compared to the others.
From what I can tell, it seems to be fatter not longer, LD type. Probably will pull one out so I can see it.
Maybe put it on the coppier with the Nossler and Sierra 175 and see what I get.
Ehh, don't bother...
Various 175 gr .308 bullets compared to the GP11 projectile
Sierra MK, Nosler CC, Barnes MB, GP11
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:39 PM ----------
Originally Posted by
speckles
I have tried the Berger's and they are ok.... I have my best results with smk bthp 168's With imr 4895 (44grains) worked very nicely.... submoa. I tried 175 smk's but they were not as good. Oh, and I used berdan primers. Powder valley had them on sale last year or 2 and I bought 10,000 of them 😳. Why, idk other than I knew they would be a rare finding in the future. Then at the height of my work-up, gp11 miraculously appeared on the market and I bought a lot to last for years. To answer your question, the bergers were not worth the extra bit of money. Greats results with Sierra match king
What method did you use to decap the GP11 brass?
-
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
Calfed
Ehh, don't bother...
Various 175 gr .308 bullets compared to the GP11 projectile
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo.../KJUYrHf-1.jpg
Sierra MK, Nosler CC, Barnes MB, GP11
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:39 PM ----------
What method did you use to decap the GP11 brass?
RCBS berdan depriming tool. relatively easy and quick, maybe not as fast as the hydrolic method but fast enough.
-
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
speckles
RCBS berdan depriming tool. relatively easy and quick, maybe not as fast as the hydrolic method but fast enough.
I've got one of those RCBS Berdan decapping tools...never really figured out how to get it to work
-
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
Calfed
I've got one of those RCBS Berdan decapping tools...never really figured out how to get it to work
Give me a day or two and I can post a video. The persnickety part is setting the pin to correct depth. That's just requires a few decaps to get to correct depth. Once set, it's bang, bang, bang..... not literally unless you have live primers.
-