+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 750k - 800k

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member DMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    09-29-2024 @ 09:56 PM
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 PM

    Question 750k - 800k

    OK..., A little late finding my way over here to the new site. Nice Place.

    So - - - Lets beat a dead horse!

    Didn't we once considered Springfield SNs in the 750,000 to 800,000 range as safe to shoot?

    Now all I see is 800,000 and above.

    Have I been cheating death all of these years shooting a 790k rifle?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    D. Mark
    ATW - ABN!

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Lancebear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-28-2011 @ 08:45 PM
    Location
    Southeast Louisiana, right on the Mississippi, just upriver from New Orleans.
    Posts
    347
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    05:11 PM
    Probably not if you don't grease rounds, and sure you don't. And probably don't shoot with obstructions in your barrel. You're good to go, but this might start the usual sh%tstorm. But maybe not, let's see. Thinkin' maybe not.

    Never know though, someone may have new info.

    Those old storms sure were fun, and a lot of info was provided. Didn't participate, but sure as hell read all of that stuff.

    Started a coupla' USMC rifle shi&storms. Always entertaining, and gained a whole lot of information.

    Death to bad guys,

    Lancebear

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel
    Rick the Librarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    04-09-2023 @ 08:59 PM
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Age
    75
    Posts
    2,301
    Real Name
    Rick Slater
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    04:11 PM
    As I understand it Springfield started to use the double heat-treatment in the 750,000 range rifles, but didn't totally switch over until the 780,000-790,000 range. In fact, a few SHT receivers apparently trickled over into the very early 800,000 range, as well.

    As you said, this anthill has been kicked up before. As I've said many times before, I don't shoot LN M1903s but know several people who do. You can lower the odds by making sure your rifle is clean, function and that you use standard powered cartridges of good quality. I go along with Bruce Canfield that there is a "small but present" chance of a receiver letting go when something "bad" happens in the chamber.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    --George Orwell

  6. #4
    Legacy Member DMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    09-29-2024 @ 09:56 PM
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick the Librarianicon View Post
    .... Springfield started to use the double heat-treatment in the 750,000 range rifles, but didn't totally switch over until the 780,000-790,000 range.....
    Thanks Rick.

    I'm tracking now and will catchup with everybody soon. I've been busy with Evil Black Rifles and what we use to call the GWOT which has caused my 1903 knowledge to slip a bit.

    My concern was that in the past I had recommended to folks that 750-800k Springfields should be OK and that anything above 800k was always Good-To-Go.

    Now I see that CMPicon Springfield matches require 810k and above to shoot and that caused me to post my question. Seems like a "lawyer" limit to me and not based on actual data from the past or recent research.

    And Lancebear - - - Agree..., "Death To Badguys!"
    D. Mark
    ATW - ABN!

  7. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    slamfire1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    11-19-2017 @ 10:00 PM
    Posts
    135
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 PM
    None of the reference books has ever given an exact serial number transition. They have given a range.

    I believe 800,000 was an easy number to remember, so that is what was and is used.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member DMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    09-29-2024 @ 09:56 PM
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by slamfire1 View Post
    ..... I believe 800,000 was an easy number to remember, so that is what was and is used.....
    Agree that the 1927 Army board could have decided that the 800k and up SNs would be an easy number for all of the arms rooms to track. Besides, since there appeared to be no way to figure out which of the 50k rifles produced between 750-800k had been DHT, 800k and above would have been a safe vote for the board members.

    Hey Gang - Found my copy of Hatcher’s Notebook!

    I think the REAL problem was the hardness of the brass cartridge cases!
    D. Mark
    ATW - ABN!

  9. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Bill H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-11-2009 @ 04:04 PM
    Posts
    107
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:11 PM
    There is no question that much of the low number problems were highlighted by poor quality ammo during WWI, although the basic issue with the heat treating has existed back as far as the Krags.

    I recently fired a number of samples of military 06 ammo, the oldest being headstamped WCC18. The ammo looked good, no corrosion, etc., but when I fired it, got symptoms of high pressure, although velocity was normal.

    It was obvious that the case head was much softer than other examples, and I cut short the accuracy part of the exercise, it just did not appear safe to shoot.

    At least a few of the examples of failed 03s in Hatchers Notebook are attributed to bad ammo.

  10. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    slamfire1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    11-19-2017 @ 10:00 PM
    Posts
    135
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by DMark View Post

    Hey Gang - Found my copy of Hatcher’s Notebook!

    I think the REAL problem was the hardness of the brass cartridge cases!
    No, what you read was corporate buck passing.

    Springfield Armory denied it had a problem because the receivers broke after case head failures. Therefore they blamed the cartridges.

    SA were following two established Government behaviors: Rule #2 Minimize Scandal. Rule #3 Take the path of least resistance.

    However, blaming pot holes for why your axle fell off will only work so long. Either all roads everywhere have to be perfectly smooth (impossible) or you fix the axle problem.

    That's what they did.

  11. #9
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-25-2024 @ 07:54 PM
    Posts
    2,513
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 PM
    At round 750,000 Springfield started making Low Number '03's to correct specs. No longer eyeballing heat color range but used pryometers for production. These are without a doubt correctly made Low Number '03's. The Army figured out by changing the heat treat process they could greaty increase the safety margin of the '03. I think that change over began at around 775,000. So Double Heat Treat receivers came into production at around 775,000. BUT many Low Number receivers were still in the production cycle and for safety sake 800,000 became the bench mark for the DHT receiver. Don't hold me to the exact serial number range and I hope some of the true experts weigh in on this rather interesting topic. Rock Island actually destroyed some Low Number receivers still in the production cycle and we have an exact serial number for their production.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts