Now, here's the type of ad that really irritates me.
It's a premium priced item with no pics, or even an offer to provide pics suggested in the body of the ad, yet the seller says Not interested in tire-kickers, or trades. Serious buyers only.
Not to just pick on this seller, but in general, some of the folks that post ads on CGN (and many other forums) need to take a course in salesmanship, or find a ghost writer to help them with their efforts. It ceases to amaze me how so many people can post so many bad ads and then wonder why they don't get a serious response, or get people who enquire, but they never respond back. Courtesy is a reciprocating behavior.
This might be a very good buy, but who will ever know and I for one, even though I'm interested, wouldn't bother to enquire about pics as I'd be worried about getting my head taken off for appearing like a "tire kicker".
Posted on CGN ....
FS Port Contract k-98 (click here)
If you can't view the advertisement, it's probably due to the fact that you have to subscribe to the EE (Equipment Exchange) forums on CGN, or the ad has been deleted, in order to view them.
Seller says:
BTW, if anyone buys this piece (or gets pics), here's the entry with a 182 picture photo gallery in the Milsurp Knowledge LibraryPortuguese 1941 Mauser Werke Oberndorf A/N k-98. This rifle was not sitting in some warehouse, shows use, but not abuse. Original Wehrmacht sling(L&F). All matching, bolt, safety, receiver, barrel,rear sight, stock, buttplate, magazine plate, screws,upper band,magazine follower, bayonet lug. Very few dings on stock, crest is still visible on left buttstock, but faint. Bluing is 70-75%. Chamber is shiny, bore is shiny, but not sharp. All stampings are clear. Not interested in tire-kickers, or trades. Serious buyers only. $925+ shipping.
Note- Identical rifle on page 319- "Backbone Of The Wehrmacht", as to what it should look like.
1941 Portuguese Contract K98k Rifle (Mfg in 1942 by Mauser Werke AG, Oberndorf a/N).... click here
Regards,
BadgerInformation
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.